ILKAF
Price
$4.40
Change
+$0.20 (+4.76%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.8B
SCCFF
Price
$0.37
Change
+$0.06 (+19.35%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
16.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ILKAF vs SCCFF

Header iconILKAF vs SCCFF Comparison
Open Charts ILKAF vs SCCFFBanner chart's image
Iluka Resources
Price$4.40
Change+$0.20 (+4.76%)
Volume$6.65K
Capitalization1.8B
Strategic Resources
Price$0.37
Change+$0.06 (+19.35%)
Volume$24.51K
Capitalization16.21M
ILKAF vs SCCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ILKAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ILKAF vs. SCCFF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILKAF is a Buy and SCCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ILKAF: $4.40 vs. SCCFF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: ILKAF and SCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ILKAF: 42% vs. SCCFF: 245%
Market capitalization -- ILKAF: $1.8B vs. SCCFF: $16.21M
ILKAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.8B. SCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $16.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ILKAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCCFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ILKAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ILKAF is a better buy in the long-term than SCCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ILKAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCCFF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ILKAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCCFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ILKAF is a better buy in the short-term than SCCFF.

Price Growth

ILKAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.01% price change this week, while SCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILKAF($1.8B) has a higher market cap than SCCFF($16.2M). ILKAF YTD gains are higher at: 51.307 vs. SCCFF (-20.771).
ILKAFSCCFFILKAF / SCCFF
Capitalization1.8B16.2M11,093%
EBITDA485MN/A-
Gain YTD51.307-20.771-247%
P/E Ratio15.23N/A-
Revenue1.12BN/A-
Total Cash136MN/A-
Total Debt291MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ILKAF vs SCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
ILKAF
SCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2142
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ILKAF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (25). This means that ILKAF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

ILKAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (100). This means that ILKAF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

ILKAF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (97). This means that ILKAF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

ILKAF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (49). This means that ILKAF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

ILKAF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCCFF (100). This means that ILKAF’s stock grew significantly faster than SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ILKAFSCCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ILKAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NIEAX19.47N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Equity A
RYGRX94.69N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth C
LEISX24.31N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Equity Income IS
PEGGX22.47N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth R4
FSGGX18.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Global ex US Index

ILKAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILKAF and SCCFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILKAF and SCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILKAF
1D Price
Change %
ILKAF100%
+4.64%
SCCFF - ILKAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTNDF - ILKAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMYLF - ILKAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLGF - ILKAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
NLIBF - ILKAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCCFF has been loosely correlated with NLIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCCFF jumps, then NLIBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCCFF
1D Price
Change %
SCCFF100%
N/A
NLIBF - SCCFF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ILKAF - SCCFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.64%
SUIFF - SCCFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUCMF - SCCFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
SHERF - SCCFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More