ILPMY
Price
$2.62
Change
+$0.14 (+5.65%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.41B
PBLOF
Price
$0.95
Change
+$0.04 (+4.40%)
Updated
Mar 20 closing price
Capitalization
20.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ILPMY vs PBLOF

Header iconILPMY vs PBLOF Comparison
Open Charts ILPMY vs PBLOFBanner chart's image
Permanent TSB Group Holdings
Price$2.62
Change+$0.14 (+5.65%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization1.41B
Public Bank
Price$0.95
Change+$0.04 (+4.40%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization20.01B
ILPMY vs PBLOF Comparison Chart in %
ILPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ILPMY vs. PBLOF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILPMY is a Buy and PBLOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ILPMY: $2.62 vs. PBLOF: $0.95)
Brand notoriety: ILPMY and PBLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ILPMY: 242% vs. PBLOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ILPMY: $1.41B vs. PBLOF: $20.01B
ILPMY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.41B. PBLOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $20.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ILPMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBLOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ILPMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBLOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ILPMY is a better buy in the long-term than PBLOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ILPMY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBLOF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ILPMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PBLOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ILPMY is a better buy in the short-term than PBLOF.

Price Growth

ILPMY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.65% price change this week, while PBLOF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBLOF($20B) has a higher market cap than ILPMY($1.41B). ILPMY has higher P/E ratio than PBLOF: ILPMY (17.17) vs PBLOF (10.80). PBLOF YTD gains are higher at: 82.692 vs. ILPMY (51.884). ILPMY has less debt than PBLOF: ILPMY (1.97B) vs PBLOF (10.3B). PBLOF has higher revenues than ILPMY: PBLOF (14.5B) vs ILPMY (658M).
ILPMYPBLOFILPMY / PBLOF
Capitalization1.41B20B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD51.88482.69263%
P/E Ratio17.1710.80159%
Revenue658M14.5B5%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.97B10.3B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ILPMY vs PBLOF: Fundamental Ratings
ILPMY
PBLOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3768
SMR RATING
1..100
165
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBLOF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as ILPMY (67). This means that PBLOF’s stock grew similarly to ILPMY’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PBLOF (68). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew similarly to PBLOF’s over the last 12 months.

PBLOF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ILPMY (16). This means that PBLOF’s stock grew similarly to ILPMY’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PBLOF (57). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew similarly to PBLOF’s over the last 12 months.

PBLOF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as ILPMY (23). This means that PBLOF’s stock grew similarly to ILPMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ILPMYPBLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ILPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPDW43.580.38
+0.88%
SPDR® Portfolio Developed Wld ex-US ETF
MEM36.810.09
+0.24%
Matthews Emerging Markets Eq Actv ETF
NUMI24.890.01
+0.04%
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
OACP23.12-0.01
-0.06%
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
PSK33.10-0.03
-0.09%
SPDR® ICE Preferred Securities ETF

ILPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILPMY and PBLOF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILPMY and PBLOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILPMY
1D Price
Change %
ILPMY100%
N/A
PBLOF - ILPMY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNRV - ILPMY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
CYVF - ILPMY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGBI - ILPMY
22%
Poorly correlated
+12.21%
ALRS - ILPMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More

PBLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBLOF has been loosely correlated with BMDPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBLOF jumps, then BMDPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBLOF
1D Price
Change %
PBLOF100%
N/A
BMDPF - PBLOF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
ILPMY - PBLOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRBF - PBLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
CKHGY - PBLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDAB - PBLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More