Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ILVBX vs RMFCX
ILVBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ILVBX vs RMFCX
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Val A
Price$10.76
Change+$0.04 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.08M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.47
Change+$0.12 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
ILVBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ILVBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ILVBX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. ILVBX (50.1M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ILVBX: RMFCX (1.26) vs ILVBX (1.02). ILVBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ILVBX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ILVBX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ILVBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ILVBX: RMFCX (250) vs ILVBX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. ILVBX (-25.36). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.96 vs. ILVBX (-16.57).
| ILVBX | RMFCX | ILVBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.91 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.270 | 11.458 | 63% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.1M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.26 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.36 | 6.64 | -382% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.18 | 28.51 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.57 | 53.96 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.87 | 89.42 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement