Advertisement
IMBBF vs IMBBY
To understand the difference between Imperial Brands Plc (IMBBF) vs. Imperial Brands Plc - ADR (IMBBY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IMBBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIMBBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IMBBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- IMBBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IMBBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IMBBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IMBBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- IMBBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
IMBBF (@Tobacco) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while IMBBY (@Tobacco) price change was +2.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
IMBBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tobacco (-0.85% weekly)The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.
| IMBBF | IMBBY | IMBBF / IMBBY | |
| Capitalization | 34.1B | 34.1B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 4.29B | 4.29B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 30.107 | 37.897 | 79% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.21 | 10.42 | 98% |
| Revenue | 32B | 32B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 599M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 10.9B | N/A | - |
IMBBF | IMBBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IMBBF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as IMBBY (9). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew similarly to IMBBY’s over the last 12 months.
IMBBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as IMBBF (9). This means that IMBBY’s stock grew similarly to IMBBF’s over the last 12 months.
IMBBY's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as IMBBF (73). This means that IMBBY’s stock grew similarly to IMBBF’s over the last 12 months.
IMBBY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as IMBBF (48). This means that IMBBY’s stock grew similarly to IMBBF’s over the last 12 months.
IMBBY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IMBBF (37). This means that IMBBY’s stock grew similarly to IMBBF’s over the last 12 months.
| IMBBF | IMBBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 9 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
IMBBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IMBBF and BTAFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMBBF and BTAFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMBBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMBBF | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| BTAFF - IMBBF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| PHJMF - IMBBF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JAPAF - IMBBF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IMBBY - IMBBF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| GDNGY - IMBBF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
IMBBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMBBY has been loosely correlated with BTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMBBY jumps, then BTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMBBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMBBY | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| BTI - IMBBY | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| MO - IMBBY | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| PM - IMBBY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
| UVV - IMBBY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| JAPAY - IMBBY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||