IMBBF
Price
$35.02
Change
+$0.30 (+0.86%)
Updated
Mar 6 closing price
Capitalization
29.73B
PHJMF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.81B
Ad is loading...

IMBBF vs PHJMF

Header iconIMBBF vs PHJMF Comparison
Open Charts IMBBF vs PHJMFBanner chart's image
Imperial Brands
Price$35.02
Change+$0.30 (+0.86%)
Volume$3.55K
Capitalization29.73B
PT Hanjaya Mandala Sampoerna Terbuka
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.89K
Capitalization3.81B
IMBBF vs PHJMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMBBF vs. PHJMF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMBBF is a Hold and PHJMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (IMBBF: $35.02 vs. PHJMF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: IMBBF and PHJMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Tobacco industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMBBF: 22% vs. PHJMF: 5%
Market capitalization -- IMBBF: $29.73B vs. PHJMF: $3.81B
IMBBF [@Tobacco] is valued at $29.73B. PHJMF’s [@Tobacco] market capitalization is $3.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $234.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $26.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMBBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePHJMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IMBBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PHJMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMBBF is a better buy in the long-term than PHJMF.

Price Growth

IMBBF (@Tobacco) experienced а -1.45% price change this week, while PHJMF (@Tobacco) price change was +19.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was -1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tobacco (-1.76% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMBBF($29.7B) has a higher market cap than PHJMF($3.81B). PHJMF has higher P/E ratio than IMBBF: PHJMF (10.27) vs IMBBF (9.19). IMBBF YTD gains are higher at: 10.182 vs. PHJMF (-1.664). PHJMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.16T vs. IMBBF (4.14B). PHJMF has more cash in the bank: 6.03T vs. IMBBF (1.08B). IMBBF has less debt than PHJMF: IMBBF (9.08B) vs PHJMF (391B). PHJMF has higher revenues than IMBBF: PHJMF (117.16T) vs IMBBF (32.4B).
IMBBFPHJMFIMBBF / PHJMF
Capitalization29.7B3.81B779%
EBITDA4.14B9.16T0%
Gain YTD10.182-1.664-612%
P/E Ratio9.1910.2790%
Revenue32.4B117.16T0%
Total Cash1.08B6.03T0%
Total Debt9.08B391B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMBBF vs PHJMF: Fundamental Ratings
IMBBF
PHJMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
9310
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PHJMF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as IMBBF (9). This means that PHJMF’s stock grew similarly to IMBBF’s over the last 12 months.

IMBBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHJMF (100). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew significantly faster than PHJMF’s over the last 12 months.

PHJMF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMBBF (93). This means that PHJMF’s stock grew significantly faster than IMBBF’s over the last 12 months.

IMBBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PHJMF (46). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew similarly to PHJMF’s over the last 12 months.

IMBBF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHJMF (60). This means that IMBBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHJMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNDC37.180.49
+1.34%
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
NVBW30.910.08
+0.27%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Nov ETF
ETX18.320.02
+0.08%
EATON VANCE Municipal Income 2028 TERM TRUST
XDJA28.47N/A
N/A
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF - January
DPST91.10-0.31
-0.34%
Direxion Daily Regional Bnks Bull 3X ETF

IMBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMBBF and BTAFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMBBF and BTAFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMBBF
1D Price
Change %
IMBBF100%
N/A
BTAFF - IMBBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.80%
PHJMF - IMBBF
15%
Poorly correlated
-12.36%
JAPAF - IMBBF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMBBY - IMBBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
GDNGY - IMBBF
0%
Poorly correlated
+5.28%
More

PHJMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PHJMF and IMBBF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PHJMF and IMBBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHJMF
1D Price
Change %
PHJMF100%
-12.36%
IMBBF - PHJMF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAPAF - PHJMF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMBBY - PHJMF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
JAPAY - PHJMF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
VPRB - PHJMF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
More