Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCB vs VO
IMCB vs VO Comparison
Open Charts IMCB vs VO
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Price$80.72
Change+$1.14 (+1.43%)
Volume$21.45K
Net Assets1.11B
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
Price$283.42
Change+$2.54 (+0.90%)
Volume$650.12K
Net Assets192.45B
IMCB vs VO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCB vs. VO commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCB is a Buy and VO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VO has more net assets: 192B vs. IMCB (1.11B). VO has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCB: VO (7.785) vs IMCB (6.725). IMCB was incepted earlier than VO: IMCB (21 years) vs VO (21 years). IMCB (0.04) and VO (0.04) have comparable expense ratios . IMCB has a higher turnover VO (16.00) vs VO (16.00).
| IMCB | VO | IMCB / VO | |
| Gain YTD | 6.725 | 7.785 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 192B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 100% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 16.00 | 113% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 1.53 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCB | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCB has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCB jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCB | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| FTV - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| CG - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | +3.30% | ||
| ARES - IMCB | 77% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| EQH - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| APO - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
More | ||||