Ad is loading...
IMCB vs VXF
IMCB vs VXF Comparison
Open Charts IMCB vs VXF
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Price$70.39
Change+$1.82 (+2.65%)
Volume$100
Net Assets938.62M
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
Price$162.46
Change+$4.32 (+2.73%)
Volume$1.26K
Net Assets101.44B
IMCB vs VXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCB vs. VXF commentary
Apr 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCB is a Hold and VXF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VXF has more net assets: 101B vs. IMCB (939M). IMCB has a higher annual dividend yield than VXF: IMCB (-9.637) vs VXF (-16.689). IMCB was incepted earlier than VXF: IMCB (21 years) vs VXF (23 years). IMCB (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than VXF (0.05). IMCB has a higher turnover VXF (11.00) vs VXF (11.00).
| IMCB | VXF | IMCB / VXF | |
| Gain YTD | -9.637 | -16.689 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 939M | 101B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.05 | 80% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 11.00 | 218% |
| Yield | 1.50 | 1.29 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCB | VXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 15 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCB has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCB jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCB | 100% | -2.18% | ||
| FTV - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| CG - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| ARES - IMCB | 77% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| EQH - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | -2.69% | ||
| APO - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | -5.64% | ||
More | ||||
VXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VXF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VXF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VXF | 100% | -2.32% | ||
| APO - VXF | 72% Closely correlated | -5.64% | ||
| KKR - VXF | 71% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| FERG - VXF | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
| XYZ - VXF | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| MRVL - VXF | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.49% | ||
More | ||||