Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs IPO
IMCG vs IPO Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs IPO
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$76.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.07K
Net Assets2.65B
Renaissance IPO ETF
Price$42.90
Change+$0.17 (+0.40%)
Volume$16.16K
Net Assets138.94M
IMCG vs IPO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. IPO commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Buy and IPO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.65B vs. IPO (139M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than IPO: IMCG (1.586) vs IPO (-1.351). IMCG was incepted earlier than IPO: IMCG (21 years) vs IPO (12 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than IPO (0.60). IPO has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| IMCG | IPO | IMCG / IPO | |
| Gain YTD | 1.586 | -1.351 | -117% |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 139M | 1,904% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.60 | 10% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 60.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 0.80 | 0.32 | 250% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | IPO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | N/A | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 83% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
IPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPO has been closely correlated with ARM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPO jumps, then ARM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPO | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| ARM - IPO | 76% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| HOOD - IPO | 73% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| TPG - IPO | 72% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| U - IPO | 70% Closely correlated | +5.05% | ||
| CRBG - IPO | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||