Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs PFUT
IMCG vs PFUT Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs PFUT
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$81.61
Change+$0.48 (+0.59%)
Volume$150
Net Assets2.84B
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Price$25.44
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Volume$12.29K
Net Assets366.12M
IMCG vs PFUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. PFUT commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a StrongBuy and PFUT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.84B vs. PFUT (366M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than PFUT: IMCG (7.783) vs PFUT (2.522). IMCG was incepted earlier than PFUT: IMCG (21 years) vs PFUT (4 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than PFUT (0.65). PFUT has a higher turnover IMCG (35.00) vs IMCG (35.00).
| IMCG | PFUT | IMCG / PFUT | |
| Gain YTD | 7.783 | 2.522 | 309% |
| Net Assets | 2.84B | 366M | 777% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.65 | 9% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 71.00 | 49% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.03 | 2,503% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +3.07% | ||
More | ||||