Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs QMOM
IMCG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs QMOM
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$83.23
Change+$0.52 (+0.63%)
Volume$104
Net Assets3.23B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$64.81
Change+$0.56 (+0.87%)
Volume$273
Net Assets336.88M
IMCG vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. QMOM commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Buy and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 3.23B vs. QMOM (337M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: IMCG (10.096) vs QMOM (0.209). IMCG was incepted earlier than QMOM: IMCG (21 years) vs QMOM (10 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover IMCG (35.00) vs IMCG (35.00).
| IMCG | QMOM | IMCG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.096 | 0.209 | 4,828% |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 337M | 958% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.29 | 21% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 363.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 0.71 | 1.40 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| DOV - IMCG | 84% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| TRMB - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| APO - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| PNR - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| APO - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||