Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs QMOM
IMCG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs QMOM
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$77.15
Change-$1.09 (-1.39%)
Volume$60.41K
Net Assets2.72B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$62.54
Change+$0.09 (+0.14%)
Volume$8.01K
Net Assets316.77M
IMCG vs QMOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. QMOM commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.72B vs. QMOM (317M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: IMCG (2.315) vs QMOM (-2.479). IMCG was incepted earlier than QMOM: IMCG (21 years) vs QMOM (10 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| IMCG | QMOM | IMCG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 2.315 | -2.479 | -93% |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 317M | 856% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.29 | 21% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 363.00 | 12% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 1.46 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| STEP - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| EQH - QMOM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| GEV - QMOM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||