Ad is loading...
IMCG vs QMOM
IMCG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs QMOM
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$66.95
Change-$2.25 (-3.25%)
Volume$252.47K
Net Assets2.39B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$54.83
Change-$1.90 (-3.35%)
Volume$49.82K
Net Assets285.28M
IMCG vs QMOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. QMOM commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.39B vs. QMOM (285M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: IMCG (-11.212) vs QMOM (-14.502). IMCG was incepted earlier than QMOM: IMCG (21 years) vs QMOM (9 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| IMCG | QMOM | IMCG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | -11.212 | -14.502 | 77% |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 285M | 837% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.29 | 21% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 363.00 | 12% |
| Yield | 0.81 | 1.52 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -3.25% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -5.89% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -4.64% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -9.89% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | -3.99% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | -5.55% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -3.35% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| GEV - QMOM | 73% Closely correlated | -5.16% | ||
| EXP - QMOM | 73% Closely correlated | -3.84% | ||
| VST - QMOM | 72% Closely correlated | -7.42% | ||
| ETN - QMOM | 72% Closely correlated | -4.54% | ||
More | ||||