IMCG vs TEL
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Buy and TEL is a StrongBuy.
TEL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IMCG | TEL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 55% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CFNAX | 79.42 | 0.31 | +0.39% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs 529A | |||
| FBFZX | 12.46 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| Franklin Managed Income Adv | |||
| CSMVX | 36.18 | -0.11 | -0.30% |
| Congress Small Cap Growth Retail | |||
| GARGX | 9.24 | -0.03 | -0.32% |
| Goldman Sachs Global Rl Estt Secs A | |||
| SPVYX | 25.42 | -0.10 | -0.39% |
| SEI Small Cap Value Y (SIMT) | |||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with NDSN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then NDSN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| NDSN - IMCG | 72% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| TER - IMCG | 71% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| URI - IMCG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| PNR - IMCG | 71% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| CZR - IMCG | 70% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
More | ||||
TEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEL has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEL jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEL | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| APH - TEL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| LFUS - TEL | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| PLXS - TEL | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| TTMI - TEL | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| CTS - TEL | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||