Ad is loading...
IMCG vs TMFM
IMCG vs TMFM Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs TMFM
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$67.01
Change-$2.19 (-3.16%)
Volume$512
Net Assets2.19B
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$23.84
Change-$0.40 (-1.65%)
Volume$100
Net Assets155.89M
IMCG vs TMFM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. TMFM commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and TMFM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.19B vs. TMFM (156M). TMFM has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: TMFM (-5.939) vs IMCG (-8.228). IMCG was incepted earlier than TMFM: IMCG (21 years) vs TMFM (11 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than TMFM (0.85). IMCG has a higher turnover TMFM (31.00) vs TMFM (31.00).
| IMCG | TMFM | IMCG / TMFM | |
| Gain YTD | -8.228 | -5.939 | 139% |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 156M | 1,401% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.85 | 7% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 31.00 | 139% |
| Yield | 0.81 | 0.08 | 979% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +9.22% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | +8.28% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | +15.55% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +14.95% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | +14.25% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | +8.63% | ||
More | ||||
TMFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFM has been loosely correlated with TRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFM jumps, then TRU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFM | 100% | +8.97% | ||
| TRU - TMFM | 63% Loosely correlated | +16.92% | ||
| CSL - TMFM | 54% Loosely correlated | +8.02% | ||
| PFGC - TMFM | 54% Loosely correlated | +8.69% | ||
| HRI - TMFM | 53% Loosely correlated | +14.48% | ||
| RXO - TMFM | 52% Loosely correlated | +15.46% | ||
More | ||||