Ad is loading...
IMFL vs VEA
IMFL vs VEA Comparison
Open Charts IMFL vs VEA
Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF
Price$23.23
Change-$1.34 (-5.45%)
Volume$637
Net Assets508.6M
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
Price$46.95
Change-$3.13 (-6.25%)
Volume$33.38K
Net Assets205.38B
IMFL vs VEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMFL vs. VEA commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMFL is a Hold and VEA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEA has more net assets: 205B vs. IMFL (509M). IMFL has a higher annual dividend yield than VEA: IMFL (5.302) vs VEA (4.862). IMFL was incepted earlier than VEA: IMFL (4 years) vs VEA (18 years). VEA (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than IMFL (0.34). IMFL has a higher turnover VEA (3.00) vs VEA (3.00).
| IMFL | VEA | IMFL / VEA | |
| Gain YTD | 5.302 | 4.862 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 509M | 205B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.03 | 1,133% |
| Turnover | 156.00 | 3.00 | 5,200% |
| Yield | 3.22 | 3.07 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMFL | VEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMFL | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| BAM - IMFL | 59% Loosely correlated | -7.38% | ||
| BHP - IMFL | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| TD - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| BN - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | -7.41% | ||
| BNS - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
More | ||||