IMG
Price
$0.65
Change
+$0.02 (+3.17%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:53 PM (EDT)
K
Price
$80.42
Change
-$0.17 (-0.21%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
50 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IMG vs K

Header iconIMG vs K Comparison
Open Charts IMG vs KBanner chart's image
CIMG
Price$0.65
Change+$0.02 (+3.17%)
Volume$2.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Kellanova
Price$80.42
Change-$0.17 (-0.21%)
Volume$33.38K
CapitalizationN/A
IMG vs K Comparison Chart
Loading...
IMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMG vs. K commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMG is a Hold and K is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (IMG: $0.63 vs. K: $80.59)
Brand notoriety: IMG and K are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMG: 3% vs. K: 137%
Market capitalization -- IMG: $1.76M vs. K: $19.5B
IMG [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.76M. K’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $19.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IMG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • K’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the long-term than IMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while K’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • K’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the short-term than IMG.

Price Growth

IMG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -22.31% price change this week, while K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.68% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($19.5B) has a higher market cap than IMG($1.76M). K YTD gains are higher at: 49.051 vs. IMG (-75.079). K has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. IMG (-9.07M). K has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. IMG (3.28M). IMG has less debt than K: IMG (500K) vs K (6.53B). K has higher revenues than IMG: K (13.1B) vs IMG (3.17M).
IMGKIMG / K
Capitalization1.76M19.5B0%
EBITDA-9.07M1.76B-1%
Gain YTD-75.07949.051-153%
P/E RatioN/A25.36-
Revenue3.17M13.1B0%
Total Cash3.28M274M1%
Total Debt500K6.53B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMG vs K: Fundamental Ratings
IMG
K
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3162
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
10037
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6318
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

K's Valuation (32) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMG (67) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMG (100) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew significantly faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.

K's SMR Rating (37) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMG (100) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMG (63) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.

K's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMG (100) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMGK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AQEAX15.10-0.06
-0.40%
Columbia Disciplined Core A
IENIX29.49-0.21
-0.71%
Invesco Energy R5
ICBAX17.71-0.13
-0.73%
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Inv
EIVFX13.25-0.10
-0.75%
Allspring Special Large Cap Value R6
RYSGX53.69-0.80
-1.47%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth A

IMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMG and JJSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMG and JJSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMG
1D Price
Change %
IMG100%
-13.11%
JJSF - IMG
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
ARZTF - IMG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRCC - IMG
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
K - IMG
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
SMPL - IMG
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
More

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, K has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if K jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
-0.09%
GIS - K
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CPB - K
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
SMPL - K
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
DAR - K
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.19%
HAIN - K
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
More