IMG
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.01 (-4.00%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
47.27M
OCGPF
Price
$2.96
Change
+$0.31 (+11.70%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
353.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMG vs OCGPF

Header iconIMG vs OCGPF Comparison
Open Charts IMG vs OCGPFBanner chart's image
CIMG
Price$0.24
Change-$0.01 (-4.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization47.27M
Oceana Group
Price$2.96
Change+$0.31 (+11.70%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization353.83M
IMG vs OCGPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMG vs. OCGPF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMG is a Hold and OCGPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IMG: $0.25 vs. OCGPF: $2.96)
Brand notoriety: IMG and OCGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMG: 6% vs. OCGPF: 172%
Market capitalization -- IMG: $47.27M vs. OCGPF: $353.83M
IMG [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $47.27M. OCGPF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $353.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCGPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IMG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCGPF is a better buy in the long-term than IMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

IMG (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -6.37% price change this week, while OCGPF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +183.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.97% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCGPF($354M) has a higher market cap than IMG($47.3M). OCGPF YTD gains are higher at: -15.429 vs. IMG (-65.589).
IMGOCGPFIMG / OCGPF
Capitalization47.3M354M13%
EBITDAN/A1.34B-
Gain YTD-65.589-15.429425%
P/E RatioN/A7.80-
RevenueN/A10.2B-
Total CashN/A830M-
Total DebtN/A4.49B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMG vs OCGPF: Fundamental Ratings
IMG
OCGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10033
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCGPF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMG (87). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew significantly faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IMG (100). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to IMG’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as IMG (100). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to IMG’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as IMG (65). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to IMG’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMG (100). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew significantly faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMGOCGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKHA11.120.01
+0.09%
Black Hawk Acquisition Corp.
ACTG3.25-0.09
-2.69%
Acacia Research Corp
PLAB23.91-0.66
-2.69%
Photronics
KD30.62-0.91
-2.89%
Kyndryl Holdings
TSLA423.39-19.40
-4.38%
Tesla

IMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMG and JJSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMG and JJSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMG
1D Price
Change %
IMG100%
-5.24%
JJSF - IMG
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
SJM - IMG
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
JBS - IMG
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
K - IMG
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
SMPL - IMG
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
More

OCGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCGPF and PRBZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCGPF and PRBZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGPF
1D Price
Change %
OCGPF100%
N/A
PRBZF - OCGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
TUFBY - OCGPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - OCGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMG - OCGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.24%
RRSFF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More