IMG
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.03 (-8.57%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.76M
SMPL
Price
$32.79
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.4B
7 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMG vs SMPL

Header iconIMG vs SMPL Comparison
Open Charts IMG vs SMPLBanner chart's image
CIMG
Price$0.32
Change-$0.03 (-8.57%)
Volume$198.55K
Capitalization1.76M
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
Price$32.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$1.03M
Capitalization3.4B
IMG vs SMPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMG vs. SMPL commentary
Jun 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMG is a Hold and SMPL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2025
Stock price -- (IMG: $0.32 vs. SMPL: $32.79)
Brand notoriety: IMG and SMPL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMG: 212% vs. SMPL: 111%
Market capitalization -- IMG: $1.76M vs. SMPL: $3.4B
IMG [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.76M. SMPL’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $3.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IMG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMPL is a better buy in the long-term than IMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IMG is a better buy in the short-term than SMPL.

Price Growth

IMG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -18.85% price change this week, while SMPL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.48% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMPL($3.4B) has a higher market cap than IMG($1.76M). SMPL YTD gains are higher at: -15.880 vs. IMG (-55.548). SMPL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 234M vs. IMG (-9.07M). SMPL has more cash in the bank: 121M vs. IMG (3.28M). IMG has less debt than SMPL: IMG (500K) vs SMPL (272M). SMPL has higher revenues than IMG: SMPL (1.25B) vs IMG (3.17M).
IMGSMPLIMG / SMPL
Capitalization1.76M3.4B0%
EBITDA-9.07M234M-4%
Gain YTD-55.548-15.880350%
P/E RatioN/A26.07-
Revenue3.17M1.25B0%
Total Cash3.28M121M3%
Total Debt500K272M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMG vs SMPL: Fundamental Ratings
IMG
SMPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5057
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
10075
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9678
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMG's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as SMPL (87) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that IMG’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

SMPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMG (100) in the null industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.

SMPL's SMR Rating (75) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as IMG (100) in the null industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to IMG’s over the last 12 months.

SMPL's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as IMG (96) in the null industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to IMG’s over the last 12 months.

SMPL's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMG (100) in the null industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMGSMPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIFD29.250.25
+0.88%
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
PRFZ39.720.13
+0.33%
Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
ARB28.370.01
+0.02%
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
PMX6.76-0.01
-0.15%
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund III
NANR57.61-0.33
-0.57%
SPDR S&P® North American Natural Res ETF

IMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMG and JJSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMG and JJSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMG
1D Price
Change %
IMG100%
-6.21%
JJSF - IMG
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
K - IMG
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
SMPL - IMG
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
FRPT - IMG
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
NSRGY - IMG
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More