IMMFF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.11 (-18.03%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
LU
Price
$2.46
Change
+$0.05 (+2.07%)
Updated
Dec 20, 12:39 PM (EDT)
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IMMFF vs LU

Header iconIMMFF vs LU Comparison
Open Charts IMMFF vs LUBanner chart's image
OMNI BRIDGEWAY
Price$0.50
Change-$0.11 (-18.03%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Lufax Holding
Price$2.46
Change+$0.05 (+2.07%)
Volume$2.2K
CapitalizationN/A
IMMFF vs LU Comparison Chart
Loading...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMMFF vs. LU commentary
Dec 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMMFF is a Hold and LU is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Stock price -- (IMMFF: $0.50 vs. LU: $2.41)
Brand notoriety: IMMFF and LU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMMFF: 100% vs. LU: 61%
Market capitalization -- IMMFF: $538.28M vs. LU: $5.09B
IMMFF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $538.28M. LU’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMMFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IMMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the long-term than IMMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

IMMFF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -8.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.94% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($5.09B) has a higher market cap than IMMFF($538M). IMMFF has higher P/E ratio than LU: IMMFF (41.67) vs LU (19.53). LU YTD gains are higher at: 75.427 vs. IMMFF (-60.938). IMMFF has less debt than LU: IMMFF (162M) vs LU (43.1B). LU has higher revenues than IMMFF: LU (32B) vs IMMFF (30.8M).
IMMFFLUIMMFF / LU
Capitalization538M5.09B11%
EBITDA-13.89MN/A-
Gain YTD-60.93875.427-81%
P/E Ratio41.6719.53213%
Revenue30.8M32B0%
Total Cash159MN/A-
Total Debt162M43.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMMFF: Fundamental Ratings
IMMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMMFFLU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTHRF0.340.02
+4.89%
Pantheon Resources Plc
OVCHY25.491.06
+4.34%
Overseas Chinese Banking Corp., Ltd.
NURAF29.26-0.38
-1.30%
Nomura Research Institute Ltd.
KGFHY6.19-0.11
-1.75%
Kingfisher plc
BIGGQ0.08-0.02
-21.57%
Big Lots, Inc.

IMMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMMFF and SHGKY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMMFF and SHGKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMMFF
1D Price
Change %
IMMFF100%
N/A
SHGKY - IMMFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPST - IMMFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-8.31%
LU - IMMFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
HTZ - IMMFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
LDI - IMMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.09%
More