Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMOAX vs RLBFX
IMOAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IMOAX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Mod A
Price$12.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
IMOAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMOAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMOAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. IMOAX (1.11B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IMOAX: RLBFX (1.97) vs IMOAX (1.78). IMOAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IMOAX (24 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). IMOAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IMOAX (17.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMOAX: RLBFX (250) vs IMOAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. IMOAX (7.78). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. IMOAX (14.39).
| IMOAX | RLBFX | IMOAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.816 | 14.331 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.97 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.78 | 9.32 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.45 | 42.18 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.39 | 40.53 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.82 | 74.39 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement