IMPP
Price
$3.37
Change
-$0.06 (-1.75%)
Updated
Sep 2, 02:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
118.04M
PED
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 2, 02:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.92M
76 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMPP vs PED

Header iconIMPP vs PED Comparison
Open Charts IMPP vs PEDBanner chart's image
Imperial Petroleum
Price$3.37
Change-$0.06 (-1.75%)
Volume$200
Capitalization118.04M
PEDEV
Price$0.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$166
Capitalization55.92M
IMPP vs PED Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMPP vs. PED commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMPP is a Buy and PED is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (IMPP: $3.43 vs. PED: $0.61)
Brand notoriety: IMPP and PED are both not notable
IMPP represents the Oil & Gas Pipelines, while PED is part of the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMPP: 278% vs. PED: 376%
Market capitalization -- IMPP: $118.04M vs. PED: $55.92M
IMPP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $118.04M. PED’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $55.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.13B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $123.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.5B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMPP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePED’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IMPP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PED’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMPP is a better buy in the long-term than PED.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMPP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PED’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMPP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IMPP is a better buy in the short-term than PED.

Price Growth

IMPP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +7.86% price change this week, while PED (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +4.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.42%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

PED is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.50% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.89% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMPP($118M) has a higher market cap than PED($55.9M). PED has higher P/E ratio than IMPP: PED (4.34) vs IMPP (2.86). IMPP YTD gains are higher at: 13.953 vs. PED (-21.851). IMPP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 63.8M vs. PED (14.7M). IMPP has more cash in the bank: 227M vs. PED (8.47M). IMPP has less debt than PED: IMPP (60.2K) vs PED (299K). IMPP has higher revenues than PED: IMPP (138M) vs PED (35.3M).
IMPPPEDIMPP / PED
Capitalization118M55.9M211%
EBITDA63.8M14.7M434%
Gain YTD13.953-21.851-64%
P/E Ratio2.864.3466%
Revenue138M35.3M391%
Total Cash227M8.47M2,681%
Total Debt60.2K299K20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PED: Fundamental Ratings
PED
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMPPPED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGDDF22.68N/A
N/A
LAGARDERE SA
NRWRF0.98N/A
N/A
Newriver Reit Plc
OMID0.02N/A
N/A
Omid Hldgs Inc
EFRGF0.32N/A
N/A
Pasofino Gold Ltd.
IDTVF31.26N/A
N/A
Industrivarden AB

IMPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMPP has been loosely correlated with HUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMPP jumps, then HUSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMPP
1D Price
Change %
IMPP100%
+3.00%
HUSA - IMPP
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
TEN - IMPP
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
LPG - IMPP
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
HPK - IMPP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
CKX - IMPP
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
More

PED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PED has been loosely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PED jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PED
1D Price
Change %
PED100%
+4.83%
MTDR - PED
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
PR - PED
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
OVV - PED
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
USEG - PED
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INDO - PED
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.45%
More