IMYSF
Price
$34.01
Change
+$1.55 (+4.78%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
JHIUF
Price
$19.70
Change
-$0.96 (-4.65%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMYSF vs JHIUF

Header iconIMYSF vs JHIUF Comparison
Open Charts IMYSF vs JHIUFBanner chart's image
IMERYS SA
Price$34.01
Change+$1.55 (+4.78%)
Volume$225
Capitalization2.1B
James Hardie Industries
Price$19.70
Change-$0.96 (-4.65%)
Volume$6.17K
Capitalization11.71B
IMYSF vs JHIUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMYSF vs. JHIUF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMYSF is a Hold and JHIUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (IMYSF: $34.01 vs. JHIUF: $19.70)
Brand notoriety: IMYSF and JHIUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMYSF: 100% vs. JHIUF: 0%
Market capitalization -- IMYSF: $2.1B vs. JHIUF: $11.71B
IMYSF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.1B. JHIUF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $11.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMYSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJHIUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IMYSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JHIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JHIUF is a better buy in the long-term than IMYSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMYSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JHIUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMYSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • JHIUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IMYSF is a better buy in the short-term than JHIUF.

Price Growth

IMYSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JHIUF (@Construction Materials) price change was -4.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHIUF($11.7B) has a higher market cap than IMYSF($2.1B). IMYSF has higher P/E ratio than JHIUF: IMYSF (51.08) vs JHIUF (25.58). IMYSF YTD gains are higher at: 18.557 vs. JHIUF (-29.743). JHIUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 903M vs. IMYSF (340M). IMYSF has more cash in the bank: 640M vs. JHIUF (563M). JHIUF has less debt than IMYSF: JHIUF (1.21B) vs IMYSF (1.91B). JHIUF has higher revenues than IMYSF: JHIUF (3.88B) vs IMYSF (3.61B).
IMYSFJHIUFIMYSF / JHIUF
Capitalization2.1B11.7B18%
EBITDA340M903M38%
Gain YTD18.557-29.743-62%
P/E Ratio51.0825.58200%
Revenue3.61B3.88B93%
Total Cash640M563M114%
Total Debt1.91B1.21B159%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMYSF vs JHIUF: Fundamental Ratings
IMYSF
JHIUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8973
SMR RATING
1..100
9443
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5492
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10060
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMYSF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as JHIUF (16). This means that IMYSF’s stock grew similarly to JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as IMYSF (89). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew similarly to IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMYSF (94). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.

IMYSF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JHIUF (92). This means that IMYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMYSF (100). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMYSFJHIUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRSGX23.700.10
+0.42%
MFS Research International R1
NAMAX14.800.01
+0.07%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl
WCMEX18.43N/A
N/A
WCM Focused Emerging Markets Instl
RDLAX11.92-0.02
-0.17%
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
APHNX17.80-0.07
-0.39%
Artisan Select Equity Institutional

IMYSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMYSF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMYSF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMYSF
1D Price
Change %
IMYSF100%
N/A
SMID - IMYSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
TGAFF - IMYSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+157.00%
PSGTY - IMYSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKSGF - IMYSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - IMYSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JHIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JHIUF and THYCF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JHIUF and THYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHIUF
1D Price
Change %
JHIUF100%
-4.62%
THYCF - JHIUF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCY - JHIUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
IMYSF - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More