IMYSF
Price
$32.45
Change
-$2.94 (-8.31%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.94B
PPCLY
Price
$0.48
Change
+$0.08 (+20.00%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
228.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IMYSF vs PPCLY

Header iconIMYSF vs PPCLY Comparison
Open Charts IMYSF vs PPCLYBanner chart's image
IMERYS SA
Price$32.45
Change-$2.94 (-8.31%)
Volume$189
Capitalization2.94B
PPC
Price$0.48
Change+$0.08 (+20.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization228.55M
IMYSF vs PPCLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMYSF vs. PPCLY commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMYSF is a Hold and PPCLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (IMYSF: $32.46 vs. PPCLY: $0.48)
Brand notoriety: IMYSF and PPCLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMYSF: 33% vs. PPCLY: 95%
Market capitalization -- IMYSF: $2.94B vs. PPCLY: $228.55M
IMYSF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.94B. PPCLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $228.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMYSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePPCLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IMYSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PPCLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PPCLY is a better buy in the long-term than IMYSF.

Price Growth

IMYSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.17% price change this week, while PPCLY (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.71% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMYSF($2.94B) has a higher market cap than PPCLY($229M). IMYSF has higher P/E ratio than PPCLY: IMYSF (22.88) vs PPCLY (3.93). PPCLY (13.663) and IMYSF (13.136) have similar YTD gains . IMYSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 544M vs. PPCLY (-512M). PPCLY has more cash in the bank: 766M vs. IMYSF (688M). PPCLY has less debt than IMYSF: PPCLY (1.51B) vs IMYSF (1.88B). PPCLY has higher revenues than IMYSF: PPCLY (9.85B) vs IMYSF (4.12B).
IMYSFPPCLYIMYSF / PPCLY
Capitalization2.94B229M1,283%
EBITDA544M-512M-106%
Gain YTD13.13613.66396%
P/E Ratio22.883.93583%
Revenue4.12B9.85B42%
Total Cash688M766M90%
Total Debt1.88B1.51B124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMYSF vs PPCLY: Fundamental Ratings
IMYSF
PPCLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7643
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMYSF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as PPCLY (9). This means that IMYSF’s stock grew similarly to PPCLY’s over the last 12 months.

PPCLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMYSF (76). This means that PPCLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.

IMYSF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as PPCLY (95). This means that IMYSF’s stock grew similarly to PPCLY’s over the last 12 months.

PPCLY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as IMYSF (53). This means that PPCLY’s stock grew similarly to IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.

PPCLY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMYSF (100). This means that PPCLY’s stock grew significantly faster than IMYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PASG0.370.02
+6.08%
Passage Bio
GB7.430.03
+0.41%
Global Blue Group Holding AG
WTW309.020.95
+0.31%
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited
COLB23.59-0.07
-0.30%
Columbia Banking System
CIVB22.05-0.28
-1.25%
Civista Bancshares

IMYSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMYSF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMYSF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMYSF
1D Price
Change %
IMYSF100%
N/A
SMID - IMYSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.51%
TGAFF - IMYSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSGTY - IMYSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKSGF - IMYSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - IMYSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PPCLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PPCLY and MCEM have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPCLY and MCEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PPCLY
1D Price
Change %
PPCLY100%
N/A
MCEM - PPCLY
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
SMID - PPCLY
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.51%
PSGTY - PPCLY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - PPCLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMYSF - PPCLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More