Ad is loading...
INAAX vs INFCX
INAAX vs INFCX Comparison
Open Charts INAAX vs INFCX
ALPS/Kotak India ESG A
Price$15.64
Change-$0.18 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets364.21M
ALPS/Kotak India ESG C
Price$13.64
Change-$0.16 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets364.21M
INAAX vs INFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INAAX vs. INFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INAAX is a StrongBuy and INFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INAAX (364M) and INFCX (364M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . INAAX pays higher dividends than INFCX: INAAX (0.33) vs INFCX (0.26). INAAX was incepted earlier than INFCX: INAAX (7 years) vs INFCX (14 years). INFCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than INAAX (1.28). INAAX (75.00) and INFCX (75.00) have comparable annual turnover. INAAX (2500) and INFCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. INAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.55 vs. INFCX (-12.94). INAAX return over 5 years is better than : 92.42 vs. INFCX (79.80).
| INAAX | INFCX | INAAX / INFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.00 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.00 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.888 | -4.100 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 364M | 364M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.26 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.55 | -12.94 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.48 | -13.00 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.42 | 79.80 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...