Ad is loading...
INCM vs RPAR
INCM vs RPAR Comparison
Open Charts INCM vs RPAR
Franklin Income Focus ETF
Price$26.07
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$1.42K
Net Assets569.9M
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
Price$19.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
Volume$100
Net Assets525.35M
INCM vs RPAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INCM vs. RPAR commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INCM is a Buy and RPAR is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INCM has more net assets: 570M vs. RPAR (525M). RPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than INCM: RPAR (3.891) vs INCM (1.082). INCM was incepted earlier than RPAR: INCM (2 years) vs RPAR (5 years). INCM (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than RPAR (0.50). INCM has a higher turnover RPAR (14.00) vs RPAR (14.00).
| INCM | RPAR | INCM / RPAR | |
| Gain YTD | 1.082 | 3.891 | 28% |
| Net Assets | 570M | 525M | 109% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.50 | 76% |
| Turnover | 46.93 | 14.00 | 335% |
| Yield | 5.33 | 2.56 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| INCM | RPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 36% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 47% | 21 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
INCM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INCM has been closely correlated with ITW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INCM jumps, then ITW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INCM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INCM | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| ITW - INCM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| MCHP - INCM | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| SHEL - INCM | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| UNP - INCM | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| BHP - INCM | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
More | ||||
RPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPAR has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RPAR jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPAR | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| WDS - RPAR | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| AWK - RPAR | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| BHP - RPAR | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| FERG - RPAR | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| RUN - RPAR | 49% Loosely correlated | +4.82% | ||
More | ||||