It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INDV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMKKGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INDV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKKGY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
INDV (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +1.20% price change this week, while MKKGY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -3.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.09%.
INDV is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
MKKGY is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
INDV | MKKGY | INDV / MKKGY | |
Capitalization | 2.91B | 76.6B | 4% |
EBITDA | 66M | 6.45B | 1% |
Gain YTD | -22.397 | -7.132 | 314% |
P/E Ratio | 2102.00 | 21.41 | 9,816% |
Revenue | 1.09B | 22.3B | 5% |
Total Cash | 410M | 1.72B | 24% |
Total Debt | 282M | 10.6B | 3% |
INDV | MKKGY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 22 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MKKGY's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for INDV (100). This means that MKKGY’s stock grew significantly faster than INDV’s over the last 12 months.
INDV's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as MKKGY (66). This means that INDV’s stock grew similarly to MKKGY’s over the last 12 months.
INDV's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MKKGY (71). This means that INDV’s stock grew similarly to MKKGY’s over the last 12 months.
INDV's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MKKGY (77). This means that INDV’s stock grew similarly to MKKGY’s over the last 12 months.
MKKGY's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as INDV (100). This means that MKKGY’s stock grew similarly to INDV’s over the last 12 months.
INDV | MKKGY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago56% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago51% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 9 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago74% | 2 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago45% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago60% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that INDV and CAIHF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INDV and CAIHF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INDV | 100% | -1.90% | ||
CAIHF - INDV | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ASRT - INDV | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
VTRS - INDV | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
MKKGY - INDV | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
TEVA - INDV | 22% Poorly correlated | +26.47% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKKGY has been loosely correlated with MKGAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKKGY jumps, then MKGAF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MKKGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MKKGY | 100% | -0.54% | ||
MKGAF - MKKGY | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
AMPH - MKKGY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
ZTS - MKKGY | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
SUPN - MKKGY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
INDV - MKKGY | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
More |