Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
INFL vs RGT
INFL vs RGT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INFL vs. RGT commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INFL is a StrongBuy and RGT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INFL has more net assets: 1.27B vs. RGT (93M). RGT has a higher annual dividend yield than INFL: RGT (13.786) vs INFL (12.337). INFL was incepted earlier than RGT: INFL (5 years) vs RGT (12 years). INFL (0.85) has a lower expense ratio than RGT (1.58). INFL has a higher turnover RGT (16.00) vs RGT (16.00).
| INFL | RGT | INFL / RGT | |
| Gain YTD | 12.337 | 13.786 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 93M | 1,366% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.58 | 54% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 16.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 1.79 | 3.02 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| INFL | RGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGT has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGT jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGT | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| APAM - RGT | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| ESAB - RGT | 48% Loosely correlated | -17.24% | ||
| APG - RGT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| GFF - RGT | 35% Loosely correlated | -13.75% | ||
| SII - RGT | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||