INFT
Price
$14.50
Change
-$0.30 (-2.03%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
31.1M
NACB
Price
$65.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

INFT vs NACB

Header iconINFT vs NACB Comparison
Open Charts INFT vs NACBBanner chart's image
Infinity Ban
Price$14.50
Change-$0.30 (-2.03%)
Volume$100
Capitalization31.1M
NATIONAL CAP BAN
Price$65.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50
CapitalizationN/A
INFT vs NACB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NACB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INFT vs. NACB commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INFT is a Hold and NACB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (INFT: $14.50 vs. NACB: $65.00)
Brand notoriety: INFT and NACB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INFT: 13% vs. NACB: 20%
Market capitalization -- INFT: $31.1M vs. NACB: $0
INFT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.1M. NACB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INFT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNACB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • INFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NACB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, INFT is a better buy in the long-term than NACB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INFT’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NACB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INFT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NACB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NACB is a better buy in the short-term than INFT.

Price Growth

INFT (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NACB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

NACB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INFT YTD gains are higher at: 54.215 vs. NACB (3.820).
INFTNACBINFT / NACB
Capitalization31.1MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD54.2153.8201,419%
P/E Ratio10.38N/A-
Revenue9.24MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INFT vs NACB: Fundamental Ratings
INFT
NACB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
238
SMR RATING
1..100
5357
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1755
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NACB's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as INFT (86). This means that NACB’s stock grew similarly to INFT’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NACB (38). This means that INFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (57). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (59). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NACB (55). This means that INFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NACB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INFTNACB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NACB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JRONF21.50N/A
N/A
Jeronimo Martins, SGPS, SA
IHCPF10.23N/A
N/A
Inchcape PLC
IVREF0.67N/A
N/A
Inovalis Real Estate Investment Trust
WFHG7.41N/A
N/A
World Financial Holding Group
OCGPF2.65N/A
N/A
Oceana Group Ltd.

INFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INFT and FIEB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INFT and FIEB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INFT
1D Price
Change %
INFT100%
N/A
FIEB - INFT
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUN - INFT
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
BKUTK - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLC - INFT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NACB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NACB and IBWC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NACB and IBWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NACB
1D Price
Change %
NACB100%
N/A
IBWC - NACB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBH - NACB
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
CTYP - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
SGBG - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INFT - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More