INFT
Price
$11.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
31.1M
NACB
Price
$75.00
Change
-$1.60 (-2.09%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

INFT vs NACB

Header iconINFT vs NACB Comparison
Open Charts INFT vs NACBBanner chart's image
Infinity Ban
Price$11.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$169
Capitalization31.1M
NATIONAL CAP BAN
Price$75.00
Change-$1.60 (-2.09%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
INFT vs NACB Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INFT vs. NACB commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INFT is a Hold and NACB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (INFT: $11.75 vs. NACB: $75.00)
Brand notoriety: INFT and NACB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INFT: 30% vs. NACB: 20%
Market capitalization -- INFT: $31.1M vs. NACB: $0
INFT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.1M. NACB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNACB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NACB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both INFT and NACB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

INFT (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NACB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

NACB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.46% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INFT YTD gains are higher at: 24.967 vs. NACB (19.793).
INFTNACBINFT / NACB
Capitalization31.1MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.96719.793126%
P/E Ratio10.38N/A-
Revenue9.24MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INFT vs NACB: Fundamental Ratings
INFT
NACB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3698
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2627
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INFT's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (84). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (27). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (100). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (42). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (100). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIFCX12.18N/A
N/A
MFS Diversified Income C
CMGSX38.19N/A
N/A
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Svc
AWIIX15.81N/A
N/A
CIBC Atlas Income Opportunities Instl
LSFLX13.59N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
PMICX10.64N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income C

INFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INFT and FIEB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INFT and FIEB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INFT
1D Price
Change %
INFT100%
N/A
FIEB - INFT
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUN - INFT
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
BKUTK - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
FGFH - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLC - INFT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NACB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NACB and IBWC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NACB and IBWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NACB
1D Price
Change %
NACB100%
N/A
IBWC - NACB
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.67%
CIBH - NACB
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
CTYP - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGBG - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INFT - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More