It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
INFY (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +6.31% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.90%.
INFY is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
INFY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| INFY | RNEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 26 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 55% | 23 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BGM | 8.16 | 0.18 | +2.26% |
| Qilian International Holding Group Ltd | |||
| IJAN | 35.35 | 0.30 | +0.86% |
| Innovator Itnl Dvp Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
| FDMO | 79.69 | 0.18 | +0.23% |
| Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | |||
| SPTI | 29.04 | 0.06 | +0.21% |
| State Street SPDR Port Itmt Term Trs ETF | |||
| CBON | 22.45 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| VanEck China Bond ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFY has been closely correlated with WIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INFY jumps, then WIT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFY | 100% | +3.33% | ||
| WIT - INFY | 71% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| CTSH - INFY | 61% Loosely correlated | +5.09% | ||
| ACN - INFY | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.59% | ||
| DXC - INFY | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| CDW - INFY | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNEM has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RNEM jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RNEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNEM | 100% | N/A | ||
| TEL - RNEM | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| TU - RNEM | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| SHCO - RNEM | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| INFY - RNEM | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.33% | ||
| FIVE - RNEM | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.89% | ||
More | ||||