ING
Price
$20.49
Change
+$0.28 (+1.39%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
54.32B
81 days until earnings call
MUFG
Price
$12.53
Change
+$0.22 (+1.79%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
116.09B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ING vs MUFG

Header iconING vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts ING vs MUFGBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$20.49
Change+$0.28 (+1.39%)
Volume$3.1M
Capitalization54.32B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$12.53
Change+$0.22 (+1.79%)
Volume$4.67M
Capitalization116.09B
ING vs MUFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ING vs. MUFG commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a StrongBuy and MUFG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (ING: $20.49 vs. MUFG: $12.53)
Brand notoriety: ING and MUFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 96% vs. MUFG: 46%
Market capitalization -- ING: $54.32B vs. MUFG: $116.09B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $54.32B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $116.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ING is a better buy in the long-term than MUFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ING and MUFG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.66% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUFG($116B) has a higher market cap than ING($54.3B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than ING: MUFG (8.85) vs ING (7.46). ING YTD gains are higher at: 37.526 vs. MUFG (6.911). ING has less debt than MUFG: ING (150B) vs MUFG (48.64T). MUFG has higher revenues than ING: MUFG (5.66T) vs ING (22.4B).
INGMUFGING / MUFG
Capitalization54.3B116B47%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.5266.911543%
P/E Ratio7.468.8584%
Revenue22.4B5.66T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt150B48.64T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
ING
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8123
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
614
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2929
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ING's Valuation (35) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (58) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (14) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ING (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (45) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

ING's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (29) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZM81.311.06
+1.32%
Zoom Communications Inc
GHC970.55-4.06
-0.42%
Graham Holdings Company
NTLA8.12-0.16
-1.93%
Intellia Therapeutics
PHGE0.52-0.04
-7.38%
BiomX Inc
VERI1.81-0.18
-9.05%
Veritone

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
+1.39%
BBVA - ING
70%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
HSBC - ING
68%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
SAN - ING
68%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
BCS - ING
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
AAVMY - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+1.79%
SMFG - MUFG
91%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
C - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
BCS - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
HSBC - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
UBS - MUFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
More