Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
INGFX vs REEBX
INGFX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts INGFX vs REEBX
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr R5
Price$35.39
Change-$0.14 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.95B
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$60.21
Change+$0.18 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.33B
INGFX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INGFX vs. REEBX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INGFX is a StrongBuy and REEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. INGFX (4.95B). INGFX pays higher dividends than REEBX: INGFX (0.57) vs REEBX (0.43). INGFX was incepted earlier than REEBX: INGFX (6 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than INGFX (0.80). REEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. INGFX (10.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than INGFX: REEBX (250) vs INGFX (1000000). REEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.06 vs. INGFX (-2.41). REEBX return over 5 years is better than : 10.08 vs. INGFX (-21.10).
| INGFX | REEBX | INGFX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.27 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.27 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.940 | 14.142 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.95B | 134B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.43 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.41 | 10.06 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.82 | 24.67 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.10 | 10.08 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement