It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INMD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKIDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INMD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIDS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
INMD (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +9.25% price change this week, while KIDS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +7.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.16%.
INMD is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
KIDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| INMD | KIDS | INMD / KIDS | |
| Capitalization | 842M | 521M | 162% |
| EBITDA | 80.5M | -6.63M | -1,215% |
| Gain YTD | -0.340 | 14.302 | -2% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.79 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 375M | 243M | 154% |
| Total Cash | 537M | 48.8M | 1,100% |
| Total Debt | 4.83M | 101M | 5% |
INMD | KIDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INMD's Valuation (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIDS (91) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that INMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIDS’s over the last 12 months.
INMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KIDS (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that INMD’s stock grew similarly to KIDS’s over the last 12 months.
INMD's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIDS (95) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that INMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIDS’s over the last 12 months.
KIDS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as INMD (49) in the null industry. This means that KIDS’s stock grew similarly to INMD’s over the last 12 months.
KIDS's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as INMD (15) in the null industry. This means that KIDS’s stock grew similarly to INMD’s over the last 12 months.
| INMD | KIDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 16 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BDBKX | 32.65 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx K | |||
| CAMIX | 32.17 | N/A | N/A |
| Cambiar International Equity Inv | |||
| BUIBX | 22.03 | N/A | N/A |
| Buffalo Flexible Allocation Inst | |||
| OAZEX | 21.00 | -0.07 | -0.33% |
| Oakmark International Small Cap R6 | |||
| RNWBX | 101.05 | -0.81 | -0.80% |
| American Funds New World R2 | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INMD has been loosely correlated with UTMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INMD jumps, then UTMD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INMD | 100% | -1.15% | ||
| UTMD - INMD | 47% Loosely correlated | +10.62% | ||
| RVTY - INMD | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| CRL - INMD | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| MTD - INMD | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| AZTA - INMD | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.59% | ||
More | ||||