Advertisement
INRLF vs ISCO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INRLF is a Hold and ISCO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INRLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileISCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- INRLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ISCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INRLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ISCO’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INRLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ISCO’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
INRLF (@Biotechnology) experienced а +0.59% price change this week, while ISCO (@Biotechnology) price change was +6.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.71%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+2.52% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| INRLF | ISCO | INRLF / ISCO | |
| Capitalization | 758M | 1.12M | 67,618% |
| EBITDA | -20.38M | 128K | -15,924% |
| Gain YTD | 104.545 | 72.202 | 145% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 196M | 9.2M | 2,130% |
| Total Cash | 161M | 920K | 17,500% |
| Total Debt | 197M | 3.85M | 5,124% |
INRLF | ISCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ISCO's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INRLF (47). This means that ISCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than INRLF’s over the last 12 months.
ISCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INRLF (100). This means that ISCO’s stock grew similarly to INRLF’s over the last 12 months.
INRLF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as ISCO (100). This means that INRLF’s stock grew similarly to ISCO’s over the last 12 months.
ISCO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as INRLF (41). This means that ISCO’s stock grew similarly to INRLF’s over the last 12 months.
INRLF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as ISCO (88). This means that INRLF’s stock grew similarly to ISCO’s over the last 12 months.
| INRLF | ISCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 25 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
INRLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INRLF has been loosely correlated with VALN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INRLF jumps, then VALN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INRLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INRLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| VALN - INRLF | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| IKT - INRLF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| IMMX - INRLF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
| NBTX - INRLF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.06% | ||
| ISCO - INRLF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||