Ad is loading...
INRSX vs PGNAX
INRSX vs PGNAX Comparison
Open Charts INRSX vs PGNAX
Macquarie Natural Resources R6
Price$15.29
Change-$0.80 (-4.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.89M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources A
Price$49.36
Change-$2.92 (-5.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets671.04M
INRSX vs PGNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INRSX vs. PGNAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INRSX is a Buy and PGNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGNAX has more cash in the bank: 671M vs. INRSX (169M). INRSX pays higher dividends than PGNAX: INRSX (5.60) vs PGNAX (0.97). INRSX was incepted earlier than PGNAX: INRSX (11 years) vs PGNAX (35 years). PGNAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than INRSX (1.10). INRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PGNAX (31.00). INRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGNAX: INRSX (0) vs PGNAX (1000). INRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.12 vs. PGNAX (-7.60). PGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 208.84 vs. INRSX (124.94).
| INRSX | PGNAX | INRSX / PGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.26 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.658 | 2.792 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 671M | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.60 | 0.97 | 577% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | -7.60 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.62 | -5.88 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 124.94 | 208.84 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.79 | 41.43 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...