INV
Price
$5.50
Change
+$0.04 (+0.73%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
308.14M
MAAS
Price
$3.85
Change
+$0.19 (+5.18%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
855.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

INV vs MAAS

Header iconINV vs MAAS Comparison
Open Charts INV vs MAASBanner chart's image
Innventure
Price$5.50
Change+$0.04 (+0.73%)
Volume$96.76K
Capitalization308.14M
Maase
Price$3.85
Change+$0.19 (+5.18%)
Volume$6.77K
Capitalization855.08M
INV vs MAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INV vs. MAAS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INV is a Buy and MAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (INV: $5.50 vs. MAAS: $3.86)
Brand notoriety: INV and MAAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INV: 39% vs. MAAS: 23%
Market capitalization -- INV: $308.14M vs. MAAS: $855.08M
INV [@Investment Managers] is valued at $308.14M. MAAS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $855.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAAS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • INV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAAS is a better buy in the long-term than INV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAAS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAAS is a better buy in the short-term than INV.

Price Growth

INV (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.92% price change this week, while MAAS (@Investment Managers) price change was +11.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAAS($855M) has a higher market cap than INV($308M). MAAS YTD gains are higher at: 1050.746 vs. INV (-60.289).
INVMAASINV / MAAS
Capitalization308M855M36%
EBITDA-456.7MN/A-
Gain YTD-60.2891050.746-6%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.47MN/A-
Total Cash6.97MN/A-
Total Debt45.3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAAS: Fundamental Ratings
MAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INVMAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHGCF47.064.05
+9.42%
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
MRCHF25.900.65
+2.57%
Miraca Holdings, Inc.
IMIUY30.150.14
+0.47%
IMI plc
SUME0.32N/A
N/A
Summer Energy Holdings, Inc.
SOMC24.99-0.01
-0.04%
Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc.

INV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INV and CG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INV and CG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INV
1D Price
Change %
INV100%
+0.73%
CG - INV
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
TPG - INV
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
MAAS - INV
12%
Poorly correlated
+5.04%
BLK - INV
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
BAM - INV
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
More

MAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAAS and OCCIN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAAS and OCCIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAAS
1D Price
Change %
MAAS100%
+5.04%
OCCIN - MAAS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
DHIL - MAAS
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
CRBG - MAAS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
GAIN - MAAS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
TRIN - MAAS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
More