It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RCAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INVE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCAT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
RCAT (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +11.80% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +4.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +53.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +106.55%.
RCAT is expected to report earnings on Apr 08, 2025.
Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
INVE | RCAT | INVE / RCAT | |
Capitalization | 196M | 58.6M | 334% |
EBITDA | -2.17M | -25.72M | 8% |
Gain YTD | -54.733 | 826.136 | -7% |
P/E Ratio | 277.78 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 116M | 17.9M | 648% |
Total Cash | 23.3M | 7.7M | 303% |
Total Debt | 15.4M | 1.39M | 1,106% |
INVE | RCAT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 21 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RCAT's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as INVE (90) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RCAT’s stock grew similarly to INVE’s over the last 12 months.
RCAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for INVE (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RCAT’s stock grew significantly faster than INVE’s over the last 12 months.
INVE's SMR Rating (17) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCAT (97) in the null industry. This means that INVE’s stock grew significantly faster than RCAT’s over the last 12 months.
RCAT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as INVE (56) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RCAT’s stock grew similarly to INVE’s over the last 12 months.
INVE's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as RCAT (99) in the null industry. This means that INVE’s stock grew similarly to RCAT’s over the last 12 months.
INVE | RCAT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago81% | 4 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that INVE and PSTG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INVE and PSTG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INVE | 100% | -5.81% | ||
PSTG - INVE | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.82% | ||
DM - INVE | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
MKFG - INVE | 21% Poorly correlated | -6.13% | ||
RGTI - INVE | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.95% | ||
UAVS - INVE | 20% Poorly correlated | -11.68% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCAT and CAN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCAT and CAN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RCAT | 100% | -15.72% | ||
CAN - RCAT | 24% Poorly correlated | -12.79% | ||
QBTS - RCAT | 22% Poorly correlated | +6.67% | ||
PSTG - RCAT | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.82% | ||
DM - RCAT | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
INVE - RCAT | 21% Poorly correlated | -5.81% | ||
More |