INVRF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
PRLPF
Price
$24.25
Change
-$0.36 (-1.46%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

INVRF vs PRLPF

Header iconINVRF vs PRLPF Comparison
Open Charts INVRF vs PRLPFBanner chart's image
Inverite Insights
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$1.3K
CapitalizationN/A
PROPEL
Price$24.25
Change-$0.36 (-1.46%)
Volume$209
CapitalizationN/A
INVRF vs PRLPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
INVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INVRF vs. PRLPF commentary
Dec 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INVRF is a Hold and PRLPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Stock price -- (INVRF: $0.02 vs. PRLPF: $24.25)
Brand notoriety: INVRF and PRLPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INVRF: 15% vs. PRLPF: 8%
Market capitalization -- INVRF: $0 vs. PRLPF: $210.53M
INVRF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $0. PRLPF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $210.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INVRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRLPF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • INVRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRLPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRLPF is a better buy in the long-term than INVRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INVRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRLPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INVRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRLPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRLPF is a better buy in the short-term than INVRF.

Price Growth

INVRF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -21.78% price change this week, while PRLPF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -8.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.94% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRLPF YTD gains are higher at: 152.604 vs. INVRF (22.139).
INVRFPRLPFINVRF / PRLPF
CapitalizationN/A211M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.139152.60415%
P/E RatioN/A13.72-
RevenueN/A228M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A150M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INVRFPRLPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIAWX53.890.16
+0.30%
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Inv
IPOCX14.94N/A
N/A
Delaware Ivy Systematic Em Mkts Eq C
DHFIX12.70-0.01
-0.08%
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated I
WOFNX61.56-0.06
-0.10%
Allspring Opportunity Inst
FHECX16.23-0.27
-1.64%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate C

INVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INVRF and AIJTY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INVRF and AIJTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INVRF
1D Price
Change %
INVRF100%
N/A
AIJTY - INVRF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZCAR - INVRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+92.42%
MWG - INVRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+7.76%
DWAY - INVRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRLPF - INVRF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
More

PRLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRLPF and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRLPF and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRLPF
1D Price
Change %
PRLPF100%
-1.46%
ECPG - PRLPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
SEZL - PRLPF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
VSTS - PRLPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
ZCAR - PRLPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+92.42%
DWAY - PRLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More