INVZ
Price
$1.70
Change
+$0.07 (+4.29%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
243.78M
20 days until earnings call
VLEEF
Price
$11.72
Change
+$1.54 (+15.11%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

INVZ vs VLEEF

Header iconINVZ vs VLEEF Comparison
Open Charts INVZ vs VLEEFBanner chart's image
Innoviz Technologies
Price$1.70
Change+$0.07 (+4.29%)
Volume$25.39K
Capitalization243.78M
Valeo SE
Price$11.72
Change+$1.54 (+15.11%)
Volume$300
Capitalization5.5B
INVZ vs VLEEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
INVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLEEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INVZ vs. VLEEF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INVZ is a StrongBuy and VLEEF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (INVZ: $1.63 vs. VLEEF: $11.73)
Brand notoriety: INVZ and VLEEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INVZ: 88% vs. VLEEF: 48%
Market capitalization -- INVZ: $243.78M vs. VLEEF: $5.5B
INVZ [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $243.78M. VLEEF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $5.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INVZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLEEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • INVZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLEEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLEEF is a better buy in the long-term than INVZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INVZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLEEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INVZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VLEEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INVZ is a better buy in the short-term than VLEEF.

Price Growth

INVZ (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while VLEEF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +15.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

INVZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.12% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLEEF($5.5B) has a higher market cap than INVZ($244M). VLEEF YTD gains are higher at: 27.584 vs. INVZ (-2.976). VLEEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.11B vs. INVZ (-123.41M). VLEEF has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. INVZ (145M). INVZ has less debt than VLEEF: INVZ (32.5M) vs VLEEF (6.27B). VLEEF has higher revenues than INVZ: VLEEF (17.7B) vs INVZ (20.9M).
INVZVLEEFINVZ / VLEEF
Capitalization244M5.5B4%
EBITDA-123.41M2.11B-6%
Gain YTD-2.97627.584-11%
P/E RatioN/A21.10-
Revenue20.9M17.7B0%
Total Cash145M1.76B8%
Total Debt32.5M6.27B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VLEEF: Fundamental Ratings
VLEEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INVZVLEEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLEEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIELY42.020.17
+0.41%
Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
GGLXF0.04N/A
N/A
GGL Resources Corp.
PLLIF6.84N/A
N/A
Pirelli S.p.A.
CSPHF0.62N/A
N/A
CSTONE PHARMACEUTICALS
GOTRF1.74N/A
-0.05%
Goliath Resources Ltd.

INVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INVZ has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INVZ jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INVZ
1D Price
Change %
INVZ100%
+1.24%
AEVA - INVZ
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
LIDR - INVZ
38%
Loosely correlated
+9.21%
MBLY - INVZ
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
BWA - INVZ
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
APTV - INVZ
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More

VLEEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLEEF and FURCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLEEF and FURCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLEEF
1D Price
Change %
VLEEF100%
N/A
FURCF - VLEEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.96%
VLEEY - VLEEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
SMTOY - VLEEF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
WKSP - VLEEF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
INVZ - VLEEF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More