It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IOSP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRPM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IOSP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RPM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
IOSP (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -2.23% price change this week, while RPM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.78%.
IOSP is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
RPM is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
IOSP | RPM | IOSP / RPM | |
Capitalization | 3.21B | 15.3B | 21% |
EBITDA | 201M | 1B | 20% |
Gain YTD | -2.767 | 24.127 | -11% |
P/E Ratio | 22.73 | 28.99 | 78% |
Revenue | 1.95B | 7.34B | 27% |
Total Cash | 204M | 263M | 78% |
Total Debt | 45.2M | 2.53B | 2% |
IOSP | RPM | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IOSP's Valuation (63) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as RPM (86) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to RPM’s over the last 12 months.
RPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IOSP (42) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that RPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
RPM's SMR Rating (39) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (62) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that RPM’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
RPM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that RPM’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
RPM's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (66) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that RPM’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
IOSP | RPM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago55% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 12 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago59% | 3 days ago51% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago54% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
OSGCX | 10.74 | 0.20 | +1.90% |
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth C | |||
ETCMX | 14.85 | 0.15 | +1.02% |
Eventide Balanced Fund Class C | |||
TPYRX | 8.75 | 0.05 | +0.57% |
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq R6 | |||
CEUEX | 55.24 | 0.10 | +0.18% |
American Funds Europacific Growth 529E | |||
GSUTX | 71.06 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights Inv |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOSP has been closely correlated with FUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IOSP jumps, then FUL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IOSP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IOSP | 100% | +0.08% | ||
FUL - IOSP | 72% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
SCL - IOSP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
AVNT - IOSP | 71% Closely correlated | +2.71% | ||
MTX - IOSP | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
CBT - IOSP | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPM has been loosely correlated with FUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RPM jumps, then FUL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RPM | 100% | +1.39% | ||
FUL - RPM | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
PPG - RPM | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
SHW - RPM | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.14% | ||
IOSP - RPM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
AVNT - RPM | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
More |