Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPAC vs VPL
IPAC vs VPL Comparison
Open Charts IPAC vs VPL
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Price$74.28
Change-$0.43 (-0.58%)
Volume$130
Net Assets1.97B
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Price$90.42
Change-$0.41 (-0.45%)
Volume$10.37K
Net Assets11.91B
IPAC vs VPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPAC vs. VPL commentary
Dec 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAC is a Hold and VPL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VPL has more net assets: 11.9B vs. IPAC (1.97B). VPL has a higher annual dividend yield than IPAC: VPL (28.357) vs IPAC (23.821). IPAC was incepted earlier than VPL: IPAC (11 years) vs VPL (21 years). VPL (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than IPAC (0.09). IPAC (5.00) and VPL (5.00) have matching turnover.
| IPAC | VPL | IPAC / VPL | |
| Gain YTD | 23.821 | 28.357 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 11.9B | 17% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.07 | 129% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 5.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 2.86 | 2.69 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IPAC | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| COMB | 23.09 | 0.35 | +1.54% |
| GraniteShares Blmbrg CmdtyBrdStr NoK1ETF | |||
| PRFZ | 46.22 | 0.16 | +0.35% |
| Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | |||
| TRIO | 66.02 | 0.11 | +0.16% |
| MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF | |||
| SIXO | 34.47 | 0.05 | +0.15% |
| AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Apr/Oct ETF | |||
| MSFD | 11.37 | -0.15 | -1.26% |
| Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF | |||
IPAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAC has been closely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAC jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAC | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| MFG - IPAC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| BHP - IPAC | 66% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ING - IPAC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| PRU - IPAC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| EMR - IPAC | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
More | ||||