IPAY
Price
$43.63
Change
-$0.27 (-0.62%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:35 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
149.71M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XT
Price
$80.45
Change
-$2.25 (-2.72%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPAY vs XT

IPAY vs XT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) vs. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT)

Key Takeaways

  • IPAY offers targeted exposure to ~40 global digital payments companies, with heavy concentration in top holdings (top 10 ~54%), while XT provides broader diversification across ~200 companies in exponential technologies spanning multiple sectors.
  • IPAY's expense ratio of 0.75% is higher than XT's 0.46%, impacting long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • IPAY focuses on fintech and payments (Technology 55%, Financials 41%), contrasting XT's multi-sector profile led by Technology (44%) and Healthcare (22%).
  • XT demonstrates stronger trend consistency in recent market cycles, benefiting from broader innovation themes like AI and robotics, versus IPAY's narrower payments niche facing sector headwinds.
  • Both are passive index-tracking ETFs, but IPAY's quarterly rebalancing supports its thematic purity, while XT's annual reconstitution and quarterly rebalance enhance stability.
  • XT's larger AUM (~$3.9B vs. IPAY's ~$174M) suggests superior liquidity for institutional and retail investors.

Introduction

In the evolving landscape of fintech and technological innovation, Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) offer distinct pathways for investors seeking growth in digital economies. IPAY provides concentrated exposure to the global digital payments ecosystem, capitalizing on the shift toward cashless transactions. XT, meanwhile, captures a wider array of exponential technologies across sectors, including AI, robotics, and healthcare innovation. While not direct competitors, both ETFs appeal to those targeting tech-driven disruption, with IPAY emphasizing payments infrastructure and XT offering diversified innovation plays. This comparison highlights their structural differences amid rising adoption of digital wallets, real-time payments, and agentic commerce trends.

Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) Overview

The Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) is a passive, thematic ETF that seeks to track the Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Payments Index, focusing on companies providing digital payment services, infrastructure, and software worldwide. Launched in 2015, it holds approximately 40 stocks, with the top 10 comprising over 54% of assets, including XYZ (Block, Inc., ~6%), V (Visa, ~6%), MA (Mastercard, ~5.5%), Adyen NV (~5.5%), and AFRM (Affirm, ~5.5%). Sector allocations emphasize Technology (55%) and Financial Services (41%), with minor Industrials exposure (4%). The expense ratio is 0.75%, and the fund is non-diversified, investing at least 80% in index components. The underlying index reconstitutes semi-annually and rebalances quarterly, maintaining thematic focus on mobile payments via ADRs and GDRs where needed. IPAY's structure suits investors pursuing pure-play fintech growth but carries concentration risk.

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) Overview

The iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT), launched in 2015, passively tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index, targeting ~200 developed and emerging market companies creating or utilizing exponential technologies across seven themes: AI, energy innovation, fintech, healthcare, cybersecurity, transportation, and robotics. Top 10 holdings represent ~35%, led by TXN (Texas Instruments, 5%), NVDA (NVIDIA, 4.2%), ADI (Analog Devices, 4%), TSLA (Tesla, 3.8%), and MSFT (Microsoft, 3.6%). Sectors are led by Information Technology (44%), Health Care (22%), and Industrials (10%). With a 0.46% expense ratio, XT is diversified, investing at least 80% in index securities. The index reconstitutes annually in December and rebalances quarterly, capping individual weights at 4% to manage concentration. Its global scope and multi-theme approach provide balanced exposure to disruptive innovation.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The fintech and exponential technologies sectors are propelled by accelerating digital transformation, with digital wallets projected to exceed 5 billion users by 2026 and tokenization enabling agentic commerce via AI-driven autonomous payments. Real-time payments, blockchain settlements, and AI fraud prevention are key catalysts, alongside regulatory clarity for DeFi and cross-border interoperability. Macro drivers include rising e-commerce (wallets at 66% of transactions) and interest in embedded finance, though risks persist from geopolitical tensions, cyber threats, and economic slowdowns impacting consumer spending. Capital flows favor broad innovation amid sector rotation toward AI and healthcare, while payments face competition from neobanks and Big Tech. Both ETFs benefit from these tailwinds, but volatility arises from regulatory scrutiny on data privacy and antitrust in fintech.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, XT has outperformed IPAY, aligning with momentum in semiconductors and AI leaders like NVDA and TXN amid sector rotation toward exponential tech. IPAY has trailed in recent market cycles, pressured by fintech volatility in consumer finance names like AFRM and COIN, despite resilience in networks such as V and MA. XT's beta of 1.26 indicates moderate volatility, bolstered by healthcare diversification, versus IPAY's higher 1.45 beta tied to payments cyclicality. Over broader periods, XT's multi-theme exposure has shown greater consistency, while IPAY's niche focus amplifies sensitivity to earnings cycles in digital transactions and interest rate expectations affecting lending. Relative positioning favors XT in innovation-driven rallies, with IPAY poised for recovery in payments adoption surges.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in fintech and tech themes.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XT with moderate conviction (~65% probability edge), owing to its superior cost efficiency, broader diversification, larger scale for liquidity, and alignment with sustained momentum in multi-sector exponential technologies. IPAY's concentrated payments theme offers higher potential upside in fintech rallies but trails on risk-adjusted profile amid recent cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IPAY vs. XT commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAY is a Hold and XT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XT has more net assets: 3.96B vs. IPAY (150M). XT has a higher annual dividend yield than IPAY: XT (19.110) vs IPAY (-15.657). IPAY was incepted earlier than XT: IPAY (11 years) vs XT (11 years). XT (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than IPAY (0.75). XT has a higher turnover IPAY (29.00) vs IPAY (29.00).
IPAYXTIPAY / XT
Gain YTD-15.65719.110-82%
Net Assets150M3.96B4%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.46163%
Turnover29.0043.0067%
Yield0.880.79112%
Fund Existence11 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPAYXT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAVYX17.38N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity I
BRLVX29.51N/A
N/A
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R5
FTASX33.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
WBBIX9.78N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Balanced I
PJVQX27.31N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Value R6

IPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAY has been closely correlated with XYZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAY jumps, then XYZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPAY
1D Price
Change %
IPAY100%
-1.15%
XYZ - IPAY
72%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
GPN - IPAY
72%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
TOST - IPAY
69%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
AFRM - IPAY
69%
Closely correlated
-2.33%
PYPL - IPAY
67%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
More