IPGDF
Price
$2.56
Change
+$0.02 (+0.79%)
Updated
Mar 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.18B
LYSDY
Price
$4.34
Change
-$0.06 (-1.36%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.31B
Ad is loading...

IPGDF vs LYSDY

Header iconIPGDF vs LYSDY Comparison
Open Charts IPGDF vs LYSDYBanner chart's image
IGO
Price$2.56
Change+$0.02 (+0.79%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization7.18B
Lynas Rare Earths
Price$4.34
Change-$0.06 (-1.36%)
Volume$323.76K
Capitalization4.31B
IPGDF vs LYSDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LYSDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPGDF vs. LYSDY commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPGDF is a Hold and LYSDY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IPGDF: $2.56 vs. LYSDY: $4.34)
Brand notoriety: IPGDF and LYSDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPGDF: 166% vs. LYSDY: 340%
Market capitalization -- IPGDF: $7.18B vs. LYSDY: $4.31B
IPGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.18B. LYSDY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $4.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPGDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IPGDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LYSDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LYSDY is a better buy in the long-term than IPGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYSDY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LYSDY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

IPGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LYSDY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.65% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPGDF($7.18B) has a higher market cap than LYSDY($4.31B). IPGDF has higher P/E ratio than LYSDY: IPGDF (12.74) vs LYSDY (11.48). LYSDY YTD gains are higher at: 9.873 vs. IPGDF (-17.581). IPGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.26B vs. LYSDY (617M). IPGDF has more cash in the bank: 494M vs. LYSDY (102M). LYSDY has less debt than IPGDF: LYSDY (202M) vs IPGDF (947M). IPGDF has higher revenues than LYSDY: IPGDF (1.02B) vs LYSDY (961M).
IPGDFLYSDYIPGDF / LYSDY
Capitalization7.18B4.31B167%
EBITDA1.26B617M204%
Gain YTD-17.5819.873-178%
P/E Ratio12.7411.48111%
Revenue1.02B961M106%
Total Cash494M102M484%
Total Debt947M202M469%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPGDF vs LYSDY: Fundamental Ratings
IPGDF
LYSDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3152
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
9049
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPGDF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYSDY (88). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than LYSDY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPGDF (100). This means that LYSDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSDY's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPGDF (90). This means that LYSDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSDY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as IPGDF (82). This means that LYSDY’s stock grew similarly to IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSDY (2). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to LYSDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYSDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LYSDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUEZX22.05N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Equity R2
MCLRX14.18N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Inv C
TBDAX16.35N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A
ARIDX6.03N/A
N/A
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value I
BRXSX13.48N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R2

IPGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPGDF has been loosely correlated with IIDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPGDF jumps, then IIDDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPGDF
1D Price
Change %
IPGDF100%
N/A
IIDDY - IPGDF
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.76%
MALRY - IPGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-18.30%
PMETF - IPGDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.82%
LYSDY - IPGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
RTNTF - IPGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.39%
More

LYSDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYSDY has been closely correlated with LYSCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYSDY jumps, then LYSCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSDY
1D Price
Change %
LYSDY100%
-1.36%
LYSCF - LYSDY
86%
Closely correlated
-5.39%
BHP - LYSDY
53%
Loosely correlated
-9.49%
RIO - LYSDY
52%
Loosely correlated
-6.44%
PILBF - LYSDY
50%
Loosely correlated
-13.77%
BDNNY - LYSDY
49%
Loosely correlated
-10.96%
More