IPGDF
Price
$3.15
Change
-$0.09 (-2.78%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
TOEYF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.05 (+41.67%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
18.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPGDF vs TOEYF

Header iconIPGDF vs TOEYF Comparison
Open Charts IPGDF vs TOEYFBanner chart's image
IGO
Price$3.15
Change-$0.09 (-2.78%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.57B
Toro Energy
Price$0.17
Change+$0.05 (+41.67%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization18.25M
IPGDF vs TOEYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPGDF vs. TOEYF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPGDF is a Hold and TOEYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IPGDF: $3.15 vs. TOEYF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: IPGDF and TOEYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPGDF: 86% vs. TOEYF: 34%
Market capitalization -- IPGDF: $2.57B vs. TOEYF: $18.25M
IPGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.57B. TOEYF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $18.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPGDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTOEYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IPGDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TOEYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPGDF is a better buy in the long-term than TOEYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOEYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TOEYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TOEYF is a better buy in the short-term than IPGDF.

Price Growth

IPGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while TOEYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +32.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPGDF($2.57B) has a higher market cap than TOEYF($18.3M). IPGDF YTD gains are higher at: 1.613 vs. TOEYF (-5.556). TOEYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.39M vs. IPGDF (-811.1M).
IPGDFTOEYFIPGDF / TOEYF
Capitalization2.57B18.3M14,033%
EBITDA-811.1M-7.39M10,971%
Gain YTD1.613-5.556-29%
P/E Ratio980.99N/A-
Revenue512MN/A-
Total Cash344MN/A-
Total Debt31.4MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPGDF vs TOEYF: Fundamental Ratings
IPGDF
TOEYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3098
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPGDF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as TOEYF (33). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to TOEYF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TOEYF (100). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to TOEYF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as TOEYF (97). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to TOEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TOEYF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as IPGDF (57). This means that TOEYF’s stock grew similarly to IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TOEYF (100). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than TOEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPGDFTOEYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTTRX34.16N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts R
UIIFX32.39N/A
N/A
Victory International Institutional
LZFIX8.73N/A
N/A
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
FGKFX36.29N/A
N/A
Fidelity Growth Company K6
CIGIX26.01-0.21
-0.80%
Calamos International Growth I

IPGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPGDF has been loosely correlated with IIDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPGDF jumps, then IIDDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPGDF
1D Price
Change %
IPGDF100%
N/A
IIDDY - IPGDF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MALRY - IPGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
PMETF - IPGDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
LYSDY - IPGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
RTNTF - IPGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TOEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TOEYF and NMG have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOEYF and NMG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOEYF
1D Price
Change %
TOEYF100%
N/A
NMG - TOEYF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
IPGDF - TOEYF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKRFF - TOEYF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.56%
CVWFF - TOEYF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSKFF - TOEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.46%
More