IPGP
Price
$84.27
Change
+$1.93 (+2.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.56B
59 days until earnings call
MRAM
Price
$6.51
Change
+$0.11 (+1.72%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
144.8M
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPGP vs MRAM

Header iconIPGP vs MRAM Comparison
Open Charts IPGP vs MRAMBanner chart's image
IPG Photonics
Price$84.27
Change+$1.93 (+2.34%)
Volume$213.03K
Capitalization3.56B
Everspin Technologies
Price$6.51
Change+$0.11 (+1.72%)
Volume$54.04K
Capitalization144.8M
IPGP vs MRAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPGP vs. MRAM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPGP is a StrongBuy and MRAM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IPGP: $84.27 vs. MRAM: $6.51)
Brand notoriety: IPGP and MRAM are both not notable
IPGP represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while MRAM is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPGP: 100% vs. MRAM: 72%
Market capitalization -- IPGP: $3.56B vs. MRAM: $144.8M
IPGP [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $3.56B. MRAM’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $144.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $296.9B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.07T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $22.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $89.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPGP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IPGP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MRAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IPGP and MRAM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPGP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MRAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRAM is a better buy in the short-term than IPGP.

Price Growth

IPGP (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while MRAM (@Semiconductors) price change was +1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.99%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

IPGP is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

MRAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+0.31% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-0.42% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPGP($3.56B) has a higher market cap than MRAM($145M). MRAM has higher P/E ratio than IPGP: MRAM (72.33) vs IPGP (24.53). IPGP YTD gains are higher at: 15.883 vs. MRAM (1.878). IPGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 54.4M vs. MRAM (2.9M). IPGP has more cash in the bank: 900M vs. MRAM (45M). MRAM has less debt than IPGP: MRAM (4M) vs IPGP (16.9M). IPGP has higher revenues than MRAM: IPGP (946M) vs MRAM (51.7M).
IPGPMRAMIPGP / MRAM
Capitalization3.56B145M2,454%
EBITDA54.4M2.9M1,877%
Gain YTD15.8831.878846%
P/E Ratio24.5372.3334%
Revenue946M51.7M1,830%
Total Cash900M45M2,000%
Total Debt16.9M4M423%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPGP vs MRAM: Fundamental Ratings
IPGP
MRAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1970
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
9488
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9257
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPGP's Valuation (60) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as MRAM (76) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that IPGP’s stock grew similarly to MRAM’s over the last 12 months.

MRAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as IPGP (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that MRAM’s stock grew similarly to IPGP’s over the last 12 months.

MRAM's SMR Rating (88) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as IPGP (94) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that MRAM’s stock grew similarly to IPGP’s over the last 12 months.

IPGP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as MRAM (47) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that IPGP’s stock grew similarly to MRAM’s over the last 12 months.

MRAM's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPGP (92) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that MRAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPGPMRAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVOX13.29N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Value C
COBYX16.85N/A
N/A
The Cook & Bynum
GXXIX13.97N/A
N/A
abrdn US Sustainable Leaders InstlSvc
NBHCX14.85N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
AULDX108.27N/A
N/A
American Century Ultra® R6

IPGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPGP has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPGP jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPGP
1D Price
Change %
IPGP100%
+2.34%
KLIC - IPGP
73%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
DIOD - IPGP
72%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
LSCC - IPGP
72%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
SLAB - IPGP
71%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
MCHP - IPGP
71%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
More

MRAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRAM has been loosely correlated with SLAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRAM jumps, then SLAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRAM
1D Price
Change %
MRAM100%
+1.72%
SLAB - MRAM
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
IPGP - MRAM
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
KLIC - MRAM
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
FORM - MRAM
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
MPWR - MRAM
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
More