IPHLF vs TLPFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPHLF is a Hold and TLPFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLPFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IPHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TLPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TLPFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TLPFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
IPHLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TLPFF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -9.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.30% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| IPHLF | TLPFF | IPHLF / TLPFF | |
| Capitalization | 1.25B | 8.47B | 15% |
| EBITDA | 131M | 1.63B | 8% |
| Gain YTD | -11.600 | -41.147 | 28% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.32 | 11.78 | 342% |
| Revenue | 412M | 8.15B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 88.4M | 852M | 10% |
| Total Debt | 161M | 3.4B | 5% |
TLPFF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IPHLF | TLPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 3% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 3% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
IPHLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPHLF has been loosely correlated with CWPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPHLF jumps, then CWPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPHLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPHLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CWPS - IPHLF | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TLPFY - IPHLF | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| TLPFF - IPHLF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| ADT - IPHLF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
| WBQNL - IPHLF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||
TLPFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLPFF has been closely correlated with TLPFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TLPFF jumps, then TLPFY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLPFF | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| TLPFY - TLPFF | 71% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| IPHLF - TLPFF | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GFAI - TLPFF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BV - TLPFF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
| VVI - TLPFF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||