It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSHPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
IPNAF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PSHPF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.17%.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
IPNAF | PSHPF | IPNAF / PSHPF | |
Capitalization | 77.1M | 119M | 65% |
EBITDA | 1.35B | 1.78B | 76% |
Gain YTD | 19.363 | 6.618 | 293% |
P/E Ratio | 10.93 | 12.45 | 88% |
Revenue | 3.31B | 6.85B | 48% |
Total Cash | 3.36B | 4.68B | 72% |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
IPNAF | PSHPF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago16% | 1 day ago6% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago17% | 1 day ago8% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPNAF has been closely correlated with PSHPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPNAF jumps, then PSHPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPNAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IPNAF | 100% | N/A | ||
PSHPF - IPNAF | 88% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
PRXXF - IPNAF | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
KLDI - IPNAF | 41% Loosely correlated | -14.29% | ||
TDCSF - IPNAF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
HPTO - IPNAF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSHPF has been closely correlated with IPNAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSHPF jumps, then IPNAF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSHPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSHPF | 100% | N/A | ||
IPNAF - PSHPF | 88% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
KLDI - PSHPF | 44% Loosely correlated | -14.29% | ||
PRXXF - PSHPF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
SNELF - PSHPF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
TDCSF - PSHPF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |