IPOAF
Price
$25.75
Change
+$0.15 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
5.71B
25 days until earnings call
JUBPF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
260.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPOAF vs JUBPF

Header iconIPOAF vs JUBPF Comparison
Open Charts IPOAF vs JUBPFBanner chart's image
Industrias Penoles S.A. de C.V
Price$25.75
Change+$0.15 (+0.59%)
Volume$349
Capitalization5.71B
Jubilee Metals Group
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$28K
Capitalization260.43M
IPOAF vs JUBPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPOAF vs. JUBPF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAF is a Buy and JUBPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (IPOAF: $25.75 vs. JUBPF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: IPOAF and JUBPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPOAF: 36% vs. JUBPF: 41%
Market capitalization -- IPOAF: $5.71B vs. JUBPF: $260.43M
IPOAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.71B. JUBPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $260.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPOAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJUBPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IPOAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JUBPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IPOAF and JUBPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPOAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JUBPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPOAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JUBPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JUBPF is a better buy in the short-term than IPOAF.

Price Growth

IPOAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.59% price change this week, while JUBPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

IPOAF is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.75% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPOAF($5.71B) has a higher market cap than JUBPF($260M). IPOAF has higher P/E ratio than JUBPF: IPOAF (46.95) vs JUBPF (15.85). IPOAF YTD gains are higher at: 106.000 vs. JUBPF (36.471). IPOAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 924M vs. JUBPF (34.2M). IPOAF has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. JUBPF (11.7M). JUBPF has less debt than IPOAF: JUBPF (16.1M) vs IPOAF (3.19B). IPOAF has higher revenues than JUBPF: IPOAF (5.53B) vs JUBPF (140M).
IPOAFJUBPFIPOAF / JUBPF
Capitalization5.71B260M2,197%
EBITDA924M34.2M2,702%
Gain YTD106.00036.471291%
P/E Ratio46.9515.85296%
Revenue5.53B140M3,950%
Total Cash1.75B11.7M14,966%
Total Debt3.19B16.1M19,832%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPOAF vs JUBPF: Fundamental Ratings
IPOAF
JUBPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1745
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3298
SMR RATING
1..100
7978
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
902
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPOAF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as JUBPF (88). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew similarly to JUBPF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JUBPF (98). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew significantly faster than JUBPF’s over the last 12 months.

JUBPF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as IPOAF (79). This means that JUBPF’s stock grew similarly to IPOAF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as JUBPF (40). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew similarly to JUBPF’s over the last 12 months.

JUBPF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPOAF (90). This means that JUBPF’s stock grew significantly faster than IPOAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPOAFJUBPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNOV50.280.10
+0.20%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Nov
JPYUSD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - United States Dollar
CADAUD1.11N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - Australian Dollar
CNYCHF0.11N/A
N/A
China Yuan - Switzerland Franc
GBPCHF1.09N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Switzerland Franc

IPOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOAF and LUCMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOAF and LUCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPOAF
1D Price
Change %
IPOAF100%
N/A
LUCMF - IPOAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
KMRPF - IPOAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMX - IPOAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.58%
IVPAF - IPOAF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
JUBPF - IPOAF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JUBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUBPF and PXCLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUBPF and PXCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUBPF
1D Price
Change %
JUBPF100%
N/A
PXCLF - JUBPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+80.59%
FLMCF - JUBPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIGCF - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.98%
DNN - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
ENCTF - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More