IPOAF
Price
$37.80
Change
+$1.40 (+3.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.72B
52 days until earnings call
JUBPF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
132.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPOAF vs JUBPF

Header iconIPOAF vs JUBPF Comparison
Open Charts IPOAF vs JUBPFBanner chart's image
Industrias Penoles S.A. de C.V
Price$37.80
Change+$1.40 (+3.85%)
Volume$3.47K
Capitalization14.72B
Jubilee Metals Group
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization132.78M
IPOAF vs JUBPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPOAF vs. JUBPF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAF is a Buy and JUBPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IPOAF: $37.80 vs. JUBPF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: IPOAF and JUBPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPOAF: 273% vs. JUBPF: 60%
Market capitalization -- IPOAF: $14.72B vs. JUBPF: $132.78M
IPOAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $14.72B. JUBPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $132.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPOAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJUBPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IPOAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JUBPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPOAF is a better buy in the long-term than JUBPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPOAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JUBPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPOAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JUBPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IPOAF is a better buy in the short-term than JUBPF.

Price Growth

IPOAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +17.65% price change this week, while JUBPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -23.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

IPOAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPOAF($14.7B) has a higher market cap than JUBPF($133M). JUBPF has higher P/E ratio than IPOAF: JUBPF (75.40) vs IPOAF (22.91). IPOAF YTD gains are higher at: 202.400 vs. JUBPF (-11.294).
IPOAFJUBPFIPOAF / JUBPF
Capitalization14.7B133M11,053%
EBITDA2.58BN/A-
Gain YTD202.400-11.294-1,792%
P/E Ratio22.9175.4030%
Revenue7.5BN/A-
Total Cash2.34BN/A-
Total Debt3.15BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPOAF vs JUBPF: Fundamental Ratings
IPOAF
JUBPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1656
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27100
SMR RATING
1..100
5478
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3591
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPOAF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as JUBPF (85). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew similarly to JUBPF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JUBPF (100). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew significantly faster than JUBPF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as JUBPF (78). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew similarly to JUBPF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JUBPF (91). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JUBPF’s over the last 12 months.

JUBPF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPOAF (98). This means that JUBPF’s stock grew significantly faster than IPOAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPOAFJUBPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEME29.560.39
+1.34%
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
XLRE42.180.42
+1.01%
The Real Estate Select Sector SPDR®
GII68.080.07
+0.10%
SPDR® S&P® Global Infrastructure ETF
PZC6.10N/A
N/A
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund III
XHYH35.69-0.04
-0.10%
BondBloxx US High Yield Hlthcr Sctr ETF

IPOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOAF and LUCMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOAF and LUCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPOAF
1D Price
Change %
IPOAF100%
+3.86%
LUCMF - IPOAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
KMRPF - IPOAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMX - IPOAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.54%
IVPAF - IPOAF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
JUBPF - IPOAF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JUBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUBPF and PXCLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUBPF and PXCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUBPF
1D Price
Change %
JUBPF100%
N/A
PXCLF - JUBPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-26.68%
FLMCF - JUBPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIGCF - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
ENCTF - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXREF - JUBPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+13.35%
More