IPOAF
Price
$25.75
Change
+$0.15 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
5.71B
25 days until earnings call
LUCMF
Price
$1.04
Change
+$0.01 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
49.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPOAF vs LUCMF

Header iconIPOAF vs LUCMF Comparison
Open Charts IPOAF vs LUCMFBanner chart's image
Industrias Penoles S.A. de C.V
Price$25.75
Change+$0.15 (+0.59%)
Volume$349
Capitalization5.71B
LUCA MINING
Price$1.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.97%)
Volume$288.9K
Capitalization49.71M
IPOAF vs LUCMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPOAF vs. LUCMF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAF is a Buy and LUCMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (IPOAF: $25.75 vs. LUCMF: $1.04)
Brand notoriety: IPOAF and LUCMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPOAF: 36% vs. LUCMF: 76%
Market capitalization -- IPOAF: $5.71B vs. LUCMF: $49.71M
IPOAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.71B. LUCMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $49.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPOAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLUCMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IPOAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LUCMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IPOAF and LUCMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPOAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUCMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPOAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LUCMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUCMF is a better buy in the short-term than IPOAF.

Price Growth

IPOAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.59% price change this week, while LUCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

IPOAF is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPOAF($5.71B) has a higher market cap than LUCMF($49.7M). IPOAF has higher P/E ratio than LUCMF: IPOAF (46.95) vs LUCMF (1.17). LUCMF YTD gains are higher at: 166.735 vs. IPOAF (106.000). IPOAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 924M vs. LUCMF (-4.28M). IPOAF has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. LUCMF (3.62M). LUCMF has less debt than IPOAF: LUCMF (43.8M) vs IPOAF (3.19B). IPOAF has higher revenues than LUCMF: IPOAF (5.53B) vs LUCMF (65.1M).
IPOAFLUCMFIPOAF / LUCMF
Capitalization5.71B49.7M11,493%
EBITDA924M-4.28M-21,614%
Gain YTD106.000166.73564%
P/E Ratio46.951.174,024%
Revenue5.53B65.1M8,495%
Total Cash1.75B3.62M48,424%
Total Debt3.19B43.8M7,290%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPOAF vs LUCMF: Fundamental Ratings
IPOAF
LUCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1728
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3288
SMR RATING
1..100
7994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
905
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPOAF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCMF (77). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUCMF (88). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCMF (94). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCMF (36). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPOAF (90). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew significantly faster than IPOAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPOAFLUCMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNOV50.280.10
+0.20%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Nov
JPYUSD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - United States Dollar
CADAUD1.11N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - Australian Dollar
CNYCHF0.11N/A
N/A
China Yuan - Switzerland Franc
GBPCHF1.09N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Switzerland Franc

IPOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOAF and LUCMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOAF and LUCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPOAF
1D Price
Change %
IPOAF100%
N/A
LUCMF - IPOAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
KMRPF - IPOAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMX - IPOAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.58%
IVPAF - IPOAF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
JUBPF - IPOAF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LUCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCMF and AAGFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCMF and AAGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCMF
1D Price
Change %
LUCMF100%
+0.48%
AAGFF - LUCMF
33%
Poorly correlated
+4.35%
AOTVF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
LUNMF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
+5.32%
TGB - LUCMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
ARREF - LUCMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.47%
More