Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWBX
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq A
Price$20.92
Change+$0.21 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets679.21M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.71
Change+$0.16 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.94B
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69.9B vs. IPOAX (679M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOAX (2.99) vs RNWBX (0.13). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOAX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than IPOAX (1.51). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOAX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.08 vs. IPOAX (6.90). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.98 vs. IPOAX (9.06).
| IPOAX | RNWBX | IPOAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.67 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.449 | 15.173 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 679M | 69.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 0.13 | 2,332% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 8.08 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.85 | 37.85 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.06 | 24.98 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.30 | 59.66 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement