Ad is loading...
IPOAX vs RNWBX
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq A
Price$19.79
Change+$0.51 (+2.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets654.85M
American Funds New World R2
Price$79.46
Change+$1.71 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWBX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. IPOAX (655M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOAX (3.30) vs RNWBX (0.14). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOAX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than IPOAX (1.51). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOAX (30.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). IPOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.68 vs. RNWBX (2.17). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. IPOAX (21.35).
| IPOAX | RNWBX | IPOAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.67 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.555 | 5.710 | 80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 655M | 63.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.30 | 0.14 | 2,321% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.68 | 2.17 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.66 | 21.63 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.35 | 35.75 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.84 | 41.98 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers