Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWBX
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq A
Price$22.11
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets691.39M
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.61
Change+$0.45 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.72B
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73.7B vs. IPOAX (691M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOAX (2.92) vs RNWBX (0.13). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOAX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than IPOAX (1.51). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOAX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). IPOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.46 vs. RNWBX (15.12). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.93 vs. IPOAX (6.01).
| IPOAX | RNWBX | IPOAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.67 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.119 | 21.224 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 691M | 73.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 0.13 | 2,329% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.46 | 15.12 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.98 | 45.18 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.01 | 23.93 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.46 | 87.45 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement