Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWBX
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq A
Price$22.59
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets697.99M
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.25
Change-$0.05 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.33B
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. IPOAX (698M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOAX (2.79) vs RNWBX (0.12). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOAX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than IPOAX (1.51). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOAX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). IPOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.44 vs. RNWBX (11.81). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 26.47 vs. IPOAX (4.54).
| IPOAX | RNWBX | IPOAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.67 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.343 | 24.065 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 698M | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 0.12 | 2,318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.44 | 11.81 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.44 | 54.92 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.54 | 26.47 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.46 | 86.78 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement