Advertisement
IPSC vs PBM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPSC is a Hold and PBM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePBM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IPSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PBM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IPSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PBM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
IPSC (@Biotechnology) experienced а -0.77% price change this week, while PBM (@Biotechnology) price change was +35.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
IPSC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+1.38% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| IPSC | PBM | IPSC / PBM | |
| Capitalization | 43.3M | 853K | 5,076% |
| EBITDA | -6.16M | -46.56M | 13% |
| Gain YTD | -50.416 | -78.355 | 64% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.09 | - |
| Revenue | 114M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 156M | 1.93M | 8,070% |
| Total Debt | 51.5M | 2.5M | 2,059% |
| IPSC | PBM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
IPSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPSC has been loosely correlated with CRSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPSC jumps, then CRSP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPSC | 100% | -3.38% | ||
| CRSP - IPSC | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| CABA - IPSC | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| IMNM - IPSC | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.86% | ||
| FATE - IPSC | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.58% | ||
| ARWR - IPSC | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PBM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBM has been loosely correlated with NEVPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBM jumps, then NEVPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBM | 100% | +12.35% | ||
| NEVPF - PBM | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NRSN - PBM | 37% Loosely correlated | +6.09% | ||
| ATHA - PBM | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.78% | ||
| BCRX - PBM | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
| IPSC - PBM | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.38% | ||
More | ||||