It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPSEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVRLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPSEY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVRLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
IPSEY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -2.59% price change this week, while LVRLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.20%.
IPSEY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
LVRLF is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
IPSEY | LVRLF | IPSEY / LVRLF | |
Capitalization | 10.4B | 18.6M | 55,914% |
EBITDA | 889M | -2.57M | -34,585% |
Gain YTD | -2.277 | -38.667 | 6% |
P/E Ratio | 23.47 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 3.28B | 4.45M | 73,836% |
Total Cash | 438M | 746K | 58,713% |
Total Debt | 1.2M | 5.81M | 21% |
IPSEY | LVRLF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IPSEY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVRLF (92). This means that IPSEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.
IPSEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that IPSEY’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.
IPSEY's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that IPSEY’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.
IPSEY's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (64). This means that IPSEY’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.
IPSEY's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that IPSEY’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.
IPSEY | LVRLF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago49% | 8 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
AMDS | 15.39 | 0.19 | +1.25% |
GraniteShares 1x Short AMD Daily ETF | |||
FLCA | 37.81 | -0.20 | -0.53% |
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | |||
DSTL | 56.16 | -0.39 | -0.69% |
Distillate US Fdmtl Stblty & Val ETF | |||
MEMX | 29.99 | -0.26 | -0.86% |
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex Chn Act ETF | |||
QABA | 58.99 | -1.33 | -2.20% |
First Trust NASDAQ® ABA Community Bk ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPSEY and LBTSF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPSEY and LBTSF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPSEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IPSEY | 100% | -1.49% | ||
LBTSF - IPSEY | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LVRLF - IPSEY | 9% Poorly correlated | +4.55% | ||
HYPMY - IPSEY | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
IPSEF - IPSEY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
INDV - IPSEY | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LVRLF and GNMLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVRLF and GNMLF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVRLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LVRLF | 100% | +4.55% | ||
GNMLF - LVRLF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MCUJF - LVRLF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IPSEY - LVRLF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
MEDIF - LVRLF | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
KSPHF - LVRLF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |