Advertisement
IPSOF vs KMNCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPSOF is a Hold and KMNCF is a Buy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPSOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMNCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IPSOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KMNCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
| IPSOF | KMNCF | IPSOF / KMNCF | |
| Capitalization | 1.93B | 79.3M | 2,431% |
| EBITDA | 414M | 11M | 3,764% |
| Gain YTD | -30.210 | 125.937 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.12 | 7.62 | 120% |
| Revenue | 2.44B | 361M | 676% |
| Total Cash | 283M | 78.2M | 362% |
| Total Debt | 497M | 22.5M | 2,209% |
IPSOF | KMNCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IPSOF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as KMNCF (5). This means that IPSOF’s stock grew similarly to KMNCF’s over the last 12 months.
KMNCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPSOF (54). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPSOF’s over the last 12 months.
IPSOF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as KMNCF (88). This means that IPSOF’s stock grew similarly to KMNCF’s over the last 12 months.
KMNCF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPSOF (85). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPSOF’s over the last 12 months.
IPSOF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as KMNCF (96). This means that IPSOF’s stock grew similarly to KMNCF’s over the last 12 months.
| IPSOF | KMNCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 17% | 1 day ago 11% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 20% | 1 day ago 23% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 23% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 17% | 1 day ago 21% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 11% | 1 day ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 12% | 1 day ago 10% |
Advertisement
IPSOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPSOF and BRC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPSOF and BRC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPSOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPSOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BRC - IPSOF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| IVDA - IPSOF | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
| KMNCF - IPSOF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KBRLF - IPSOF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IKTSY - IPSOF | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||
KMNCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KMNCF and IPSOF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMNCF and IPSOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMNCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMNCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IPSOF - KMNCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KBRLF - KMNCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| INTO - KMNCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HZNOF - KMNCF | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.93% | ||
| IVDA - KMNCF | -0% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
More | ||||